already started? of course. this is the way donald trump gaslights us, right? he wants to tell us the real motivation behind all of this is political. when we know he declared so early in order to make it political. so, we just have to simply take matters to the word. which is, taking to be lying, as he typically is want to do. and move. on i think this particular superseding indictments is striking. it s has historical echoes, it reminds me of richard nixon s destruction of the tapes. and it s also the latest example in donald trump s ongoing belief that he is above everything, he should not be held accountable for anything. but reading the indictment is extraordinarily strong. oh yeah, absolutely. the fbi saying the recovered 100 into classified documents. he is charged with holding on to 32 of them. that newly added top secret document appears to have been in that first batch of boxes handed over to nara, and the indictment says this is the document that trump showed bedminster
and they don t have interest in wanting it to be dragged out in public. but in this case, you have a candidate, a defendant who is a candidate, who may also not want to have that happen. is it in trump s best interest right now to consider a plea? right now, before having the benefit of the discovery, i do not think so. i think that he needs to see what the actual discovery is, so he can make a better informed decision. i know that this particular client is not interested in any however, as a general proposition, unless the client comes to me and says, look, this is what i did, give me the best possible deal, you really do have to see what the government has to be able to make a better determination of it. for example, if you look at this bedminster document, reading the indictment it appears that no document was ever found. so, it is the kind of thing