Between 2000 and three and 2006 were not only the difficulties in toronto but a packed was developed between the hardliners and the hardliners in washington who fed off of each other and ended up in the situation. That ended up with president khatami being replaced by president ahmadinejad. The United States helped to produce that situation. Lastly, may i ask a question that follows on from the previous question . Will the foreign secretary make it clear to the americans that if Prime Minister netanyahus efforts at the United States Congress Prevent president obama from continuing with the negotiations, the uk, germany, france and the eu will have to detach themselves from america and reach their own conclusions, along with other members of the p5 . I am grateful for the right honorable gentlemans remarks and i agree very much about the importance of maintaining momentum. It was possible to see that even over the past two weeks. The 10day gap between the negotiations that took place tw
If they ask stupid questions, i tell them they are stupid. That is the relationship every candidate should try to have with the media. Over there, please . I think what we all want to know, what does it take for a republican candidate to beat hillary, and can you do that . I have no idea if i can do it, but listen i think the question should be broader. What does it take for a republican candidate to win . We have to do better than over the last two cycles. We have to reach out to other constituencies that have not voted for us in the past, and we better be doing it now. The fact is, our country is changing, like it always does. As a country changes demographically and economically, people who want to lead first have to understand who they are asking to lead. They need to listen to those people. I think leadership is just as much about listening as it is about talking. For republicans, we cant give the percentage of the hispanic vote and africanamerican vote that we have nationally and
commitment to the existing strategy, reflected on the bravery and shared sacrifice of united kingdom and united states armed forces in afghanistan, and agreed that the importance of progress on the political track to complement the military effort was essential. is it not time, after nearly 10 years of british deployment in afghanistan, that the whole strategy should be reconsidered? last year, 1,000 afghan people died, and 300 and more british soldiers have lost their lives in afghanistan, as have many from other coalition forces. opinion polls in afghanistan show declining support for western involvement there. if british troops are going to remain there for another five years, how many more are going to die, how much deeper is the civil war going to get and how much deeper are we going to be involved in conflicts in that region? is it not time to say that this strategy has run its course and that it is time, now, to withdraw from afghanistan? my right honorable friend th