Vadodara: A man who falsely gave his identity as a Prime Minister Office (PMO) officer to secure school admission for two sons of his friend was arres.
Bokaro: BJP national president J P Nadda on Thursday labelled the Hemant Soren-led coalition government in Jharkhand as the “most corrupt” and accused.
that might actually intensify the resolve to do something ex post facto, if that s possible, but again, you know, i asked chuck schumer straight up, i said, what about doing this right now before there s an invasion. the purpose of the sanctions are to be a deterrent, but so far this doesn t seem to have deterred anything because congress is [inaudible] edward: thanks, chad pergram. your reporting excellent as always. thank you very much. so u.s. destroyers that were off the east coast of the u.s. now in european waters all as a russian invasion of ukraine could be imminent. stay right here, we re on it. h p just because of this. (woman) wow, that s something. (burke) you get a whole lot of something with farmers policy perks. [echoing] get a quote today. we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum
goodwill for our armed forces around the country since we haven t done it for so long and since we ve been at war since 9/11 the more i think you know, what these guys have been fighting our battles and they deserve to be honored and if it costs a little bit of money to do it maybe we could do it ch p cheaper in a different place than washington but i think we ought to do it. $92 million is a lot of dough. go ahead, rick. well, look, i think my friend scott is right on the point, honoring our troops is a meritorious action. i think this parade, unfortunately, was about aggrandizing donald trump s ego because he likes things that go boom. and he was very much wanting to have himself as the sort of gener generalissimo figure to be watching over the troops parading past to honor him. i don t think donald trump really has, you know, anything beyond his own personal image and his own personal ego involved in this thing. and it s almost juvenile in the way he obsesses about this particul
party chair, who is also a sitting legislator, brazenly acknowledge that he wants to spend more taxpayer dollars with the hope of getting fewer voters? i mean that s not only wrong for montana, it s wrong for the country. we need to be figuring out ways to encourage people to vote, certainly not take away their voting franchise. i was trying to follow the history of this proposal and i read all these on-eds and looked at the testimony from the county clerks and administrators, people who run these elections around the state, and it doesn t seem like it was offered as a partisan thing. it doesn t seem like it was offered as even a proposal to try to increase voter turnout in the state. seems like the county, like we re out of monday, the november election was really expensive. we d like to do this, it s ch p cheaper, and we ve got experience with it. it feels like it became partisan when it just started as a technocratic fiscally conservative thing. well, and that s right, because a