I just wanted to point out that in the early 97 or 98, actually i was responsible for bringing joc to department of public works. And when i came over to puc, i brought it to the puc. And the whole issue was to really help us do Small Projects instead of doing plans and specs and going out and advertising, joc was the vehicle that you can actually perform that. And, so, weve been working, trying to include more local businesses. We went out with the we spearheaded the micro joc where its a micro set aside for small businesses. And weve looked at bonding issues on joc. So, weve done a lot to really make joc, you know, palatable to a lot of small businesses. And what miguel mentioned, we are very proud about that. I think the issue, you know, as far as the audit is concerned is actually pointing out some things that we acknowledge and there are some thing we want to fix. There are some things we dont agree and weve said much that we dont agree, i think on one issue. But we i think we wil
Thing by cutting off the funding. The mayor has to get rid of the of ministration, we all know that. Have to get rid of alvarez. Let him sleep out there with the tenants. Right now the bottom line is the tenants. This audit will show that they are out of compliance; it would show that there are total violations and it is going to show the reason why im going to file an injunction, im going to hire Angela Alioto the stopple procedures in the city and county that relates to africanamerican tenants; you are playing around here like we are playing games. Those tenants are the one suffering. The authority is out of compliance. Chair thank you. I will come back of another chance. Chair any of the speakers for item 2. Seeing none Public Comment is closed. Gvl gavel we have a motion on the motion . I make a motion to move this item with a positive recommendation. Chair supervisor cohen do you want to say a few words . We have a motion to set the item forward with recommendations, narrowing dow
Remaining balance on the citys state revenue last reserve fund of [speaker not understood] 810,605. We point out we recommend approval of that 6. 6 million. We are recommending approval of 3,8,000,9 34 shown on page 5 of our report. And that is for monies that would cover unavoidable or already incurred costs. And then the balance of 3,580,4 61 which is shown in table 6 on page 36 of our report, we consider that to be a policy matter only because the board determines the priorities of what should be expended from the city state Revenue Reserve lost fund. So, our recommendation are on the bottom of page 36. We recommend that you amend the ordinance to delete the Human Service agencies, appropriation for inhouse supported Services Administration and reduce a million 114,76 total requested appropriation by 581,300. That would reflect revised total of 5 34,0 06 remaining for the department of Public Health. And we recommend that you amendedth proposed ordinance on page 2 to reduce ,169,175
Thank you. We have ms. Howard here from our Mayors Office of budget. Good afternoon, supervisors, kate howard, [speaker not understood]. Im here before you to approve an event over the supplemental thats before you appropriating fund from our state revenue lost reserve to a variety of programs that were reduced in the governors budget last year. I also have with me staff from the Human Services agency, the department of aging Adult Services, juvenile probation, the department of Public Health, and the Arts Commission in the event that there are specific questions about any of the appropriations. As you will remember, last year the governors budget proposed and it was adopted by the legislature a number of reductions in both local revenues and direct cuts to services that affect the city of San Francisco. In anticipation of those cuts, the city appropriated 15 million pending final approval of the budget and so those funds are set aside in the event of state cuts. We are recommending in
The city state Revenue Reserve lost fund. So, our recommendation are on the bottom of page 36. We recommend that you amend the ordinance to delete the Human Service agencies, appropriation for inhouse supported Services Administration and reduce a million 114,76 total requested appropriation by 581,300. That would reflect revised total of 5 34,0 06 remaining for the department of Public Health. And we recommend that you amendedth proposed ordinance on page 2 to reduce ,169,175 offsetting appropriation from state loss Revenue Reserve by the same 580,300 to 6,589,585. And our second recommendation is to amend the ordinance on page 2 to delete the 1,800,000 source of funding for the children with families commission. And on page 5 to delete that same 1,800,000 appropriation no longer needed by the commission. They have sufficient funds in their budget. So, its not under budgeting that. It would be fully it would be fully budgeted. Its simply that in this request its no longer needed. And