after them to kill americans it does not make sense. the administration ought to reexamine the idea of establishing safe zones and put that present and center in the u.n. negotiation. it does have the potential of changing the battlefield conditions and they have been a stalemate for too long. we have heard about the retake of ramadi for a long-term and i hope it happens and is imminent but if the past is press distant it will take a long-term and i am concerned the lock is dicking and the danger to the american people is still very present. let s talk about american people and the couple that launched the terror attack in san bernardino that killed 14 americans. as you look back, now, and as the top democrat on the house intelligence committee, was this an intersection failure? at least, were there things that we should have been able to pick up before the attack, that we failed to pick up? that is exact the question we are studying. that is, what can we learn from
i don t think that makes sense, but i think the administration ought to look at reestablishing safe zones and put this front and center in this u.n. negotiation because i think it does have potential of really changing the battlefield conditions and they ve been stalemated for too long. i hope it happens, but if the past is precedence that will still take a long time. i m concerned the clock is still ticking. the danger to the american people is still very present. let s talk about american people and specifically about that couple that launched the terror attack in san bernardino that killed 14 americans as you look back now, the top democrat, on the house intelligence committee, was there an intelligence failure? or at least were there things that we should have been able to pick up before the attack that we failed to pick up? that s exactly the question were studying. what can we learn? what did we do wrong?
dictated by battlefield conditions. do you agree that future drawdowns should not be announced ahead of time like the president did before, that he should just be announced sort of a week before they happen, and is that feasible? they should be event driven. that s the biggest problem. we ve been doing this now for almost 15 years and we announce a surge and announce when it s going to end. we announce troop withdrawals and announce that we re actually going to keep people in afghanistan, past the 2017 or 2016 withdrawal date. we don t want to telegraph to the enemy what we re doing, and we have a tendency to do that, to inform a domestic audience. and when it doesn t resonate well in afghanistan, especially with the forces we re trying to train. that s a big problem. ever by let you go, look, you were the intelligence adviser to general david petraeus doesn t mean he listened to me. it s been such a long war and it s cost so many american lives and so much heartbreak, at t
critical. right. you know well the commanders did a good job reacting and moving their forces as an analogy, as battlefield conditions changed. they adjusted the troopers and the corrections officers, the marshals and the agents. and that is what they did here clearly. these guys are very dangerous. sad news when anybody dies even a vicious guy like matt but it s good news for the residents of upstate new york. because matt was a crime looking for a place to happen. a vicious crime. and sweat still is. but i think they are on his heels. i don t think he ll last long. he may get picked up tonight. these guys are on foot. this is why they are caught. once joyce mitchell dumped them their plan fell apart big time. and i realized that when the
national security, the things lindsey graham says about national security. i like the thing that george pa pataki says. everybody in the race but you. i like the fact i know george pataki up close by i would say being in battlefield conditions. but he is in the race now and we could have 18, 24, when all is said and done. why not you? i believe i can t get nominated because of my views on gay marriage, i m in favor i ve gay rights and gay marriage. i see it as an issue of equality. i m pro choice, i m i m pro choice. and i am pro immigrant and haven t backed down. these guys running right now must maybe some of them each think they could be the nominee and president of the united states. none of them are deal withing the same liabilities and getting through a primary that i am, and