knowing exactly where somebody is based upon cell phone towers. this is critical because there s a lot of circumstantial evidence in this case. and if the defense can keep him away from the crime scene on the 13th of november 2022? that is critical. but at the same time, you re going to see a battle of the experts. there isn t a ton of forensics in these cases. this is one of those and making it that very notion. i mean, you ve got prosecutors arguing that cell phone data did ping at the scene of the crime the night of the murders, but they all say they found his dna on a knife sheath near one of the victims. i do wonder in terms of how people are going to view the data. and again, this trial is not begun. we don t have all what they re going to be able to provide. and i ve ultimately approved. but how do you weigh these two things in front of a jury? the notion of dna or the cell tower data again, this is all that forensics in the middle of a trial right now.
lawrence: here to break down to new evidence, the five host jeanine pirro. he has a student of criminal justice. he used to work in the lab. so he was going to try some sneaky stuff. well, not only try sneaky stuff, but he knows defense, okay? we knew his alibi was going to be that he wasn t there, obviously. but now what they specifically said in recent value file papers, we have an expert to pre that he was not near the house where the four victims were killed. it is kind of interesting because what it tells me in addition to him going out to see the moon and stars when driving alone at night, now they are saying, you know, he really wasn t most of the house. this tees up the battle of the experts. what will happen now is that the state prosecutors are going to come in and say, his cell phone
but if they were to lose this piece of evidence it will be devastating for the prosecution. it s going to be a battle of the experts. however this is such a gruesome gruesome homicide i think there s enough evidence they re going to have i would tip the scales probably toward the prosecution in these types of cases they would have to fumble the football to use a football analogy, to relate not be able to get a conviction in this case but again that is where the experts come in you do not know how much money the experts are being paid for it with the but s are going to believe. whether not they are pure review and. tested had they screwed up on other cases in the past? that will all come out in cross-examination. arthel: i m glad you mention the brutality of this because people s children were killed in the process. bob, thank you for joining us. steve forte millions in california at risk of life-threatening floods as hurricane hilary advances north toward the golden state. details on t
dana: before closing arguments and the field trip over to the crime scene, that s the last thing the jury heard before we get to this point. cindy, what did you think of that? well, dana, the defense came out swinging in their case. they started as you mentioned with a loving brother who described a wonderful relationship between his wife and his son. and then they followed that up with two expert witnesses who both agreed that the state s pathologist and witness was just wrong. so we find ourselves here with a little bit of a battle of the experts where you have the state s pathologist saying it was a fatal gunshot to paul murdaugh from the front and that the shooter had to be three feet or more away sort of what they seem to suggest the evidence supports. then you have these two experts saying no, it was a close contact wound. the gun barrel was on likely an paul murdaugh s head otherwise not enough force
recklessness and negligence, which is involuntary manslaughter. this will in the end, i think, be a battle of the experts and who the jury will believe. pete: yeah. a violation of basic gun safety. i m not a lawyer but i stayed at a holiday inn express and i know you can t pass a law based on something in the past. thanks, gregg. back on the east coast, everyone s facialist socialist some people bernie sanders is going on tour to promote his new book titled it s okay to be angry about capitalism. he s selling this book on the free market. the book is not free. you have to buy it through a capitalist system and then he s charging guests almost $100 just to attend one of his anti-capitalism events. surprisingly bernie was asked to explained this hypocrisy during