russians in the past, it s not clear that he s going to pay them any more than he s paid any other creditor if they are his creditor. but, malcolm, there s no indication that any of the decisions being made in syria are coming from the president. he seems to have simply delegated that entire region of the world to whoever the military commanders are in the region. i agree with you on that point. i think this is what s happening with the regional battle commanders are making decisions that are tactically advantageous to them, especially these strikes up in raqqah. the opposition the attacks that we took along the jordanian/iraqi border, they re not playing any games because they ve been delegated this authority. on the other hand, donald trump is not looking at this game at all strategically. the united states could be brushing up against russia and creating tactical friction, you know, all over the place. but, you know, like he said, if he is in debt to them in some way, whether
theaters, in syria, where there have been where american and russian forces are getting ever closer to some kind of terrible accident. in northeast asia, where there s a widening gap between the american and the asian positions. donald trump because of his confrontational non-strategic nature, whatever he owes the russians in the past, it s not clear that he s going to pay them any more than he s paid any other creditor if they are his creditor. but, malcolm, there s no indication that any of the decisions being made in syria are coming from the president. he seems to have simply delegated that entire region of the world to whoever the military commanders are in the region. i agree with you on that point. i think this is what s happening with the regional battle commanders are making decisions that are tactically advantageous to them, especially these strikes up in raqqah. the opposition the attacks that we took along the