get rid of certain bacteria for example or even get rid of certain bacteria for example or even come - get rid of certain bacteria for- example or even come mosquitoes for example. example or even come mosquitoes for e>
what is in this review, address the issue. on the basis of what is in this review, would - address the issue. on the basis of what is in this review, would you i address the issue. on the basis of. what is in this review, would you as shadow ministerfor what is in this review, would you as shadow minister for women and inequalities, encourage women who have been attacked nonetheless to come forward? i have been attacked nonetheless to come forward? come forward? i will always encourage come forward? i will always encourage women - come forward? i will always encourage women to - come forward? i will always encourage women to go - come forward? i will always encourage women to go to | come forward? i will always i encourage women to go to the come forward? i will always encourage women to go to the police, but i can understand the myriad of reasons why people might not want to. and i think that it is most important, ratherthan to. and i think that it is most important, rather tha
were left with a much more kind of, you know, weakened set of tools but it was still important that the justice department be able to defend voting rights then when we were seeing a spate of laws being enacted after the shelby county decision. i think which is pernicious about the moment we re in now, is not only the series of laws getting enacted and states around the country that are curving voting accesser, but they re doing so on a basis of, you know, complete lack of evidence for why they may be necessary and the attorney general spoke to this yesterday. he spoke about the fact that both intention agencies in the last administration and this one, every state and federal court that considered the question of why their infected their elections found decisively no. that s being used to justify the passage of laws to curb voting
arguments. they are just riffing off what they ve heard. rumors on television and worse. they re legitimizing conspiracy these are. it s also just a logical fallacy. it s intellectually dishonest and gets to something we talked about before. i think there s a goblin outside the door. prove to me that there s not a goblin outside the door. is that on me or you? that s on you. exactly. so you don t do an election audit to prove a theory of madness. no, this is the know nothing, suspect everything school of interrogation. and that s not the way to run an election or a state government. and it undermines faith in democracy on the basis of, what as we just heard? nothing. please go check behind the door and see if there s a goblin. that s part of parenting. you are looking under the bed for the monster. we re all familiar with this but we don t carry that over into the other parts of our life, correct? and my kids when they were 4 should not have been in charge
figure for the area and so they do have a very close relationship despite the differences. the 2 men were very different not least in their views on religion. narry was a self professed atheist something rare in a country where refusing to express religious belief is a to boot. gandhi was deeply religious he began each meeting with prayer. life in india is permeated by the values of hinduism which assigns a person s caste on the basis of. that hinduism has been traditionally because it has a tolerant religion not given to proselytizing.