Bream. Good morning shannon. Good morning guys how are you . Will we wanted to dive into one of the most important topics of the woke and possibly over a bigger timeline here for the eyes of america thats happening in new mexico where the governor has teated to declare emergency a Public Health emergency in suspend in essence conceal Open Carry Laws In Albuquerque heres where we want to dive into the deep end with you shannon. Is it the case that in some instances weve certain seen it tried feels like successfully governments can set aside rights and, you know, citizenry, expectations of the way of life in cases of emergency. Does chef any ground whatsoever on which to stand shannon . Will, this is going to be really tough im thinking what Justice Clarence thomas would like a word with the governor based on his jurisprudence based on what the Supreme Court has done i think got there in time it would have a really hard time stay manager practice the thing is like shes only given us a 30
The discussion of the targeting of subsidies. Well, from the beginning of the implementation of the Health Transformation plan, which coincided with the notification of General Health policies, a part of the targeting of subsidies was allocated to the Health Sector in 2014 and 2015, but then this portion became weaker. Recently, with the implementation of the darvar plan was an attempt to improve the targeting of subsidies. Resources should be allocated to the drug sector, so that the people will not be harmed by allocating half of their expenses to the drug sector dont see, well, this was done to some extent, but there are reports from reliable sources about this area in 1402, 60 of these resources were allocated to the pharmaceutical sector from the targeting of subsidies and other resources, and. At present, anyway. Drug manufacturing companies, drug manufacturers , hospitals, and pharmacies have problems in the discussion of the resources of the pharmaceutical sector. This issue sh
Federal communications commission. In proceedings which lasted over four hours the commissioners considered and voted on several issues including rowboat Call Blocking regulations. Media ownership rules into the a new broadcast standard for television. Good morning welcome to that november 2017 meeting of the federal communications commission. Good morning to you and good morning commissioners. You will hear eight items for your consideration first you will consider a report in order that would expressly authorize Voice Service providers to block certain types of robo calls that falsely appear to be from telephone numbers that do not or cannot make outgoing calls. It would prohibit Voice Service them blocking the 911 calls under these rules. To provide a mechanism to allow subscribers whose legitimate calls are blocked an error to stop such block it and clarify that providers may exclude. You will consider a report in order. Order on reconsideration. Provide four gigahertz for satellit
Landmark cases cspans producedistory series in cooperation with the National Constitution center, is boring that in his stories and constitutional dramas but to get Supreme Court decisions. Quite often, and many of our most famous decisions, a coupler quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what society of live in a 310 million different people. They helped stick together because they believe in a rule of law. Welcome to landmark cases, our series is looking at 12 of the most important cases in the Supreme Court history, we will lend more about the people and the issues behind them. Tonight we will talk about the case of lochner v. New york. This case give rise to an error that defines this report for the next 34 years. Let me introduce you to our two guests that will tell us more about this important case and why has been important for this report and our countrys history. Brandon barnett is that Georgetown University law school. He
Closet facility in the neighborhood the standard is we will be thirty times below the level that will be allowed by the federal government i understand that people have fears about those issues with San Franciscos own standards with respect to and i authenticates i understand the standard now and there are two theres the zoning protected standard that applies that detracts from the significantly from the defining characteristics of the neighborhood if if is a street of excellent view then the planning standard i was reciting earlier it will significantly impair the view the scenic view that is the landmarks building and so for the this particular building of vallejo fails into the planning protected and the Planning Department based on both of those the aesthetics for the small facility didnt supercede those standards and the gun pointing department made the proper recommendation to the did you want and is protested to the public works officer said the standards were accurately met we