With money running over it. Its more of a gradual slope, but we have to stop the downward slope that were on. Its important that we do that. And this is a body that can do that. Congress can do that. We do a war of words around here, this protecting the rich sticks. I dont know of anybody thats trying to protect the rich. The problem comes into the definition of rich. Thats a hard one to explain. And any attempt that looks like that goes back to the sticky word rich, which nobody is trying to protect. I used to be in business. It was one of those i was one of those Small Business men. And i know that at the end of the year the business would show a profit. Unfortunately, we couldnt take the money out of the business if we were going to continue to grow the business. If we were going to put more people on. That meant that we needed to have more product. That meant we have to have more investment in the business. So the money that we could have taken out that showed as profit actually we
Of the bright minds in the city working together to analyze this data that will help us use our resources enforcement and education and when it comes time to pitting things in the ground the department of public works and Mayors Office on disability and Carmen Johnson and tom from our building inspector were working he together to put this stuff in the ground and that finally at the sfmta were led had by a board of directors theyve identified safety as the number one priority so i want to acknowledge sheryl bringing man here strongest voice advocating for bicycle and Pedestrian Safety and all the road users with all the folks standing behind me and all the staff work and everybody in San Francisco a taking on the challenge and responsibility to slow down and be aware and get around the city safer we can make this a great place so thanks to the folks behind me all of you looking forward to marking this a safer city. Thank welcome to let san franco Planning Commission regular hearing for
That there are plans to make changes. I know this chief is providing some information of whats necessary and im assuming we are just waiting for that or are we, do we know if we are going to make appropriate suggestions in the mayors budget this coming fiscal year . Thank you for the question, supervisor. So the exclusive operating agreement is essentially an agreement with the state that allows the city of San Franciscos ambulance to have full jurisdiction over 80 percent of the calls and we have go other private providers in the market. It requires that we meet 80 percent of the call volume of medical transport. It has been brought to the mayors attention by the chief and by others certainly, by you supervisor and others in the Fire Department that we are not fully meeting that 80 percent of call volume, and the mayor has asked the chief for her best recommendations about how to achieve that. As you know it is a policy decision for the city to continue with that exclusive operating a
None, Public Comment is closed. Commissioners commissioner antonini. Move to continue items one, two a and b to the dates spifkd. Xhopgs commissioner moore. Commissioner sugaya. Commissioner fong commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes naems 6 to zero and and places you under your consent calendar all matters are considered commission on matters that are within the commissions jurisdiction and are not on todays agenda. There will be no separate decision of the unless the staff or public requests and its severed at this point. Case 3 intention to initiate the Department Code amendments to eliminating foes and item 4 at the Market Street request for condominium subdivision and item 5 at the 718 composer condominium common versus at the 17th street request for conditional use authorization. I do have one speaker card for item 4 yes. Allen. Rerespectfully request this matter be taken off the consent calendar. Well hear it first item of the consent calendar im
Happens nearly every year that large numbers of california red leg ed frogs are stranded at sharp park under existing rates of water removal at sharp park. If we in accrues increase that rate of change, it will become worse. Its the rate of change that is motor most important to the species. It will adapt to small changes in the water level that occur under normal conditions. When the pumps are turned on and started to remove more than 10,000 gallons, its not able to adjust to. The department has said there is no changes to the pump house protocols on the one hand while on the other hand they say these pumps are the basis for the environmental conditions of the project. Those Baseline Environmental conditions have never been considered by any Environmental Review document ever by the recs and Park Department or planning department. There is no document we can reference to understand what the environmental consequences are of those existing pump house rates and this project it says on i