through the evidence and testimony. what stands out to you? what stands out is how much trump was alone. this hearing laid out new and clear details how he urged supporters to converge on the capitol and even as it went out of control for hours, he refused to call off the attack. did he know about the violence? witnesses say absolutely it started minutes after he finished speaking. virtually everyone on the staff was aware of it, concerned about it and one witness after another say the president went to the dining room by the oval office where he sat all afternoon watching fox news showing the carnage next to the oval office. that s where think stand in terms of him knowing about it. did he try to stop it? no. indeed, witnesses say even the secret service agents afraid for their own lives were scrambling to try to get the vice president out to safety he wouldn t do anything. listen to some of the traffic between those secret service agents when they were concerned. we nee
and no one knows exactly what he plans to do, but the committee has been filling in critical gaps of what was happening and perhaps, more notably what was not happening. during those 187 minutes on january 6th when they argue then president donald trump was derelict in his duties. cnn s tom foreman has been going through all of the evidence and all of the testimony. tom, what stands out to you? what stands out is how much trump was alone. this hearing laid out new and clearer detailses about how he urged supporters to converge on the capitol and even as it went out of control for hours, he refused to call off the attack. did he know about the violence? witnesses say absolutely it started minutes after he finished speaking. virtually everyone on the staff was aware of it, concerned about it, and one witness after another say the president went to this dining room next to the oval office based on this graphic video exhibit where he sat all afternoon watching fox news, which w
trolling the supreme court. he s saying if you were willing to allow this flawed legal reasoning to let this abortion law stand in the state of texas, then you must act consistently and allow this law to stand in california and if you don t, shame on you and i will call you out for the hypocrites that you are. so a lot of politics going on, laura, as well as some legal i ll call shenanigans by governors like newsom. i got a chuckle at the idea of consistency and we ll chuckle in harmony, if that s a thing, the idea of the supreme court on the very case overturning roe v. wade, the dobbs decision trying to compartmentalize saying this rule will apply here and here is the base logic, not anything else that comes from the same thing. i wonder the idea of trolling the supreme court on a matter of
legal reasoning to let this abortion law stand in the state of texas, then you must act consistently and allow this law to stand in california. and if you don t, shame on you and i will call you out for the hypocrites that you are. so a lot of politics going on, laura, as well as some legal i ll call shenanigans by governors like newsom. the reason i kind of chuckle at the idea of consistency, ar areva, and we ll chuckle in harmony, if that s a thing, the idea of the supreme court on the very case overturning roe v. wade, the dobbs decision trying to compartmentalize and it s inconsistent, and saying hey, this fundamental rule will apply here and is the base logic, but not anything else that comes from the same thing. i wonder the idea of trolling the supreme court on a matter of consistency might be an exercise in futility. we will see. david, the law also comes as states are dealing with other politically sensitive issues