dead. that number sadly is expected to grow welcome to fox news but i am alicia in for arthel. super i m eric shawn. at least four people remained missing at this hour. dozens more injured from the powerful storms. the catastrophic twisters and the town of rolling fork, mississippi about 60 miles northwest of the state capitol of jackson account basically has been wiped off the map. national weather service is the same tornado that devastated that town is believed to have raced eastward going 70 miles an hour pretty did not weaken as it then slammed into mississippi in several towns in alabama on a 100-mile path of destruction. x thousand the twisters path and loss of power some reporting on port 80% of customers without electricity. mississippi governor kate reeves declaring a state of emergency today president biden says fema director on the ground there tomorrow. too far from the very latest coach of the ground charles watson is an armory, mississippi or is the hardest hit
$75 million. what you see on the left there is what letitia james says is all things considered the rough actual truth, a value of $75 billion. now, you might notice when you look at this bar chart here that it seems really kind of low, and that s because of what you re about to see. to leave room for the trump claims you have to build a giant chart where the trump organization made claims legally binding that this was worth $739 million. that s not a bit above or double. it is, as you see, about nine times more than, according to the case, what the a.g. says it s worth. so it is false as best as anyone can tell. it certainly never fetched $739 million or anything close to that in a sale. what you re seeing on your screen in simple form, which i m leading the newscast with, because it s important, is a piece of evidence for dismantling the trump organization. if this evidence holds and a judge signs off on it, you can see trump and his family banned from running any corporati
violate the rights of law-abiding citizens and get away with it. it is the reason unfortunately. and the reason they can get away with it, eric, because they do not have enough law enforcement officers on that force to assist and bring some of these criminals to justice. eric: did a thing sense of anti- police trend amongst them they flout the law and we ve seen this to other cities and they think they can get away with it. and the police come for some, have no power or no or moral code to base laws in this country. we see that unfortunately all over the country taking control and advantage of law-abiding citizens. they are doing it in the name of
these are cherished beliefs, and it works provided that if you have that belief you don t then riser to power over it laws and legislation and have those laws and legislation force others into that same belief system. so, the pluralistic feature of this country, i think is something that can and should be cherished. so, how does science distinguish slip in a political truth. you know what that is? it s what becomes true simply because it got repeated so many times our brain has this failure mode well, we think it s a success mode where you hear something so many times. your brain says, must be true. but the scientific truth is what you establish to be true through experiment, observations, repeated and when that is done, it is true whether or not you believe in it. if you re going to base laws on
establish marriage equality, the federal government cannot discriminate against marriages in those states compared to marriages in any other state so what it says is that where you have marriage equality, the federal government must recognize those marriages. the second significance of it is that the reasoning of the court is reasoning that would support requiring states everywhere to recognize marriage equality. because what it says is that you have to give special scrutiny to laws that discriminate against people who have been discriminated against in the past and that people who are engaged in same-sex relationships fall into that category and the second thing that it says is that it is not permissible to base laws on moral disapproval. if you disapprove of a same-sex lifestyle, that s your personal opinion but you cannot enforce that through the laws of the