he left a message on our answering machine and said i went to the board. he goes i m dismayed. the board refused my ability to do this. i m afraid this could get serious and quick. you could lose your uterus or life. you need to find a doctor who can perform a procedure at a different location. he said this is not base d on medicine. it s based on politics. he apologized profusely. we had a friend who is an administrator at another hospital. he got us in meimmediately to t head of the doctor. the doctor said i have to do this procedure immediately. you re about ready to have serious complications and had that procedure done. it was clear if abortion is illegal, roe v wade is over turned and in michigan, all abortion is outlawed, with would be in a horrible situation and my wife, at the time, she could have lost her life. this is something that happens
this came out months later shows how much we still don t know about the president s actions and how chose our democracy was to being destroyed by this ex-president. he went on to say, base d on these notes, leave the rest to me. do we know what he meant by that? so we don t know it precisely, what he meant. he did invoke the r s in congress. that would suggest he would try to take that statement to gin up public outrage with a particular focus on republicans in congress to see if perhaps he could delay the certification or increase that vote total not only in the house but paerhaps in the senat. clearly he was going to take that declaration, quote, un unquote, to the court of public opinion to try to pressure republicans to overturn the election results. this is why in the select committee in the house, those republicans who spoke to the president in those hours and days, their testimony could be key. the question, will those
against rosenstein, if you were on the team here, would there be any strategic advantage to having these out in public view? i think it s very tricky here, i think it s based on the statements that we have seen the president make, based on his own tweets, base d on his tendency o tweet about other people sand mueller. so i can understand the jitters that the folks on his legal team might have in coming forward and giving that testimony, that that could potentially only hurt him and only be problematic. i think it s worth noting that these questions, the president was incomplete in his questions saying that none of these questions were about collusion, some of these questions go 2krek directly to the question of whether there was conspiracy, at this level, the investigators are not going to ask any questions they don t already
navarr o there in 2016 was also making the argument that these tariffs are needed to protect national security buchlt if the president leaves mexico and canada out, doesn t that undermine the whole argument? look, this is a bad policy. let s start with that. this is going to raise the price of steel. a report just came out today, analysis of the auto industry, huge user of steel, will cost 45,000 auto jobs because they ll have to pay more for their materials. you see that down the line. now the rationale that this should be base d on national security is obviously disproven by the president s own words. you saw him right there in his announcement saying i reserve the right to raise the rate or lower the rate on whoever i want because i just want to be treated fairly. that negotiating tactic that this will be used because we want to get them to change their tariff rates that s not a national security rationale.
have increased because the marketplace is not healthy. arizona, 116% increase in premiums year over year between 2016 and 2017. nationally between 2014 and today. not sustainable for the middle class. what about the working class? what about working class americans that actually benefited a great deal from being able to have obamacare? i think the house bill was problematic for them, no question about it. the senate bill does something clever, we re going to it adjust base d on income. taking it down to the poverty line, more people will be eligible for subsidies under the senate bill than under obamacare. that is true. it s not perfect. there are some things they have not been able to get right yet.