And mission of a lutheran church. This was integrally related to the church itself. The question was, the scrap tire program that was used allegedly to replace dangerous pebbled Craig Lowndes playgrounds with rubberized tires, whether a religious group could be required to be admitted to a program to receive compensation for this redo of their playground. Although it was called the playground case, for many of us, it is a lot more significant than that because it raises the question, can the United States thatme court order states want to protect the conscience of its people and protected zone treasury against distributing funding to churches, can they be ordered to be included in a program that is available to other people . The Supreme Court majority said, yes, no problem with that. Justice sotomayor are wrote a thisclear dissent saying is way more significant than just about playgrounds, it is about whether churches, for the first time in American History, can actually get tax dolla
Remind our viewers about the dispute over a playground that ended up in the Supreme Court. Guest it was a dispute over a playground that was owned and controlled and called a ministry and mission of a lutheran church. This was integrally related to the church itself. The question was, the scrap tire program that was used allegedly to replace dangerous pebbled Craig Lowndes playgrounds with rubberized tires, whether a religious group could be required to be admitted to a program to receive compensation for this redo of their playground. Although it was called the playground case, for many of us, it is a lot more significant than that because it raises the question, can the United States thatme court order states want to protect the conscience of its people and protected zone treasury against distributing funding to churches, can they be ordered to be included in a program that is available to other people . The Supreme Court majority said, yes, no problem with that. Justice sotomayor ar