About the language that some of these democrats are using and how they are encouraging the violence. We talk about impeachment and the coup effort against the president of the United States who from day one really never had a chance with the media and the opposition, and we worry about the future of thishe country. When i have known each other 25 years . Sean probably. 25 26 years. Mark and we have never been more concerned in our lives like our audience is. Your bookdi is called live free or die, america and the world on the brink. You have not written a book in ten years. Sean i have not. Mark tell america what motivated you and why you wrote the book. Sean it is the moment. In latin, i have the other book live free or america dies. I talk i to you about this, i ws thinking about it almost a year ago. I could see this coming. I could see this moment coming. And that was even before the impeachment. This was after the russia hoax and everything we had been through. What a year this ha
Host author mark with income and your most recent book, restoring the American Republic, you proposed amendment to the constitution, including term limits for members of congress, a repeal of the 17th amendment or the senate, establishing term limits for Supreme Court justices, limiting federal spending, limiting federal taxes, limiting the federal bureaucracy. Which of these and most important to you . Guest they are all of the same genre. Guest so theyre all quite important, and the goal or the purpose of the book is to notbot only talk about how to revive the constitution and restore the republic, but to inform people on what the republic is supposet to look like, how the s constitution is supposed tonsti function and to move some of the Decision Making away from thenta centralized Government Back to t the state legislatures acting collectively as the framers intended. Nte host you write in the liberty amendments about the 17th amendment. 17th amendment t the public interest, but th
That reach of integrity is irresponsible and unacceptable to me. On this situation, it began weeks to months ago and i thought the problem was limited and isolated and i believe that. But i no longer believe that it is systemic. I was too trusting of some and i accepted it and i now know that it has been misleading in regard to patient wait times. I cannot explain the lack of integrity among some of the leaders of our health care facility. This is something that i have rarely encountered during my 30 years in uniform. And so i will not defend it because it is not worth defending. But i can take responsibility with responsibility for it. And i do. So given the fact i now know, i apologize with the Senior Leader of the department of Veterans Affairs and i extend my condolences to the veterans of this country and their families and loved ones who i have been honored to serve for 45 years now. I also offer an apology to members of congress and the Veterans Services organizations including
There were two bills at National Review. And in the conservative movement, two bills. Bill buckley, a brilliant shooting star who lit up the sky, and bill rusher, a neverwavering north star by which conservatives learn today chart their learned to chart their political course. Many have written about william f. Buckley jr. , that irresistible renaissance man, but no one until david frisk has given us an indepth portrait of the other bill, william a. Rusher, who among his other salutary contributions played a pivotal role in the life of the National Draft Goldwater Committee. And that was critical. Because if there had been no draft Goldwater Committee, there would have been no president ial candidate Barry Goldwater in 1964. And if there had been no candidate goldwater in 1964, there would have been no president elect Ronald Reagan in 1980. It was goldwater, you see, who approved reagans famous a time for choosing television address which made reagan a political star overnight and led
[applause] thank you, john. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. There were two bills at National Review and in the conservative movement. Two bills. Bill buckley, a brilliant shooting star who lit up the sky and william rusher, and never wavering north star by which conservatives learned to chart their political course. Many have written about william f. Buckley jr. That irresistible renaissance man, but no one until david frisk has given us an indepth portrait of the other bill, william rusher. Who among his other solutes for contributions played a pivotal role in the life of the National Draft Goldwater Committee. That was critical because if there had been no Draft Goldwater Committee there would have been no president ial candidate Barry Goldwater in 1964 and if there had been no candidate goldwater in 1964, there would have been no president elect Ronald Reagan in 1980. It was goldwater who approved reagans famous a time for choosing television address which made reagan politica