I have some questions in general about this document. There is a different between city owned medical facilities and noncity owned medical facilities. I guess my concern is that we talk about this eligible for Development Initiative and some things that would have to be met by institutions that qualify in terms of Square Footage New Buildings or additions. But, my concern is this where would this go . An example was brought up to changing a medical facility to pool hall. Im concerned about a medical facility who wanted to locate on the siting by the corridor on the street where you are told you cant do that because there are too many medical institutions. Many of our hospitals do not just deal with San Francisco residents. Many people come from outside the city for services at ucsf and kaiser and even as a dentist i have 30 percent of my patients who reside outside of San Francisco. The needs of a particular medical facility are dictated by their patient base, not necessarily everybody
Buildings or additions. But, my concern is this where would this go . An example was brought up to changing a medical facility to pool hall. Im concerned about a medical facility who wanted to locate on the siting by the corridor on the street where you are told you cant do that because there are too many medical institutions. Many of our hospitals do not just deal with San Francisco residents. Many people come from outside the city for services at ucsf and kaiser and even as a dentist i have 30 percent of my patients who reside outside of San Francisco. The needs of a particular medical facility are dictated by their patient base, not necessarily everybody who happens to be living in San Francisco. So i have some concerns about what would happen in land use terms because i dont want to put another barrier for development for Health Care Facilities might be beneficial to the city or to many people who are needing health care services. And in particular there was some talk about the obv
This go . An example was brought up to changing a medical facility to pool hall. Im concerned about a medical facility who wanted to locate on the siting by the corridor on the street where you are told you cant do that because there are too many medical institutions. Many of our hospitals do not just deal with San Francisco residents. Many people come from outside the city for services at ucsf and kaiser and even as a dentist i have 30 percent of my patients who reside outside of San Francisco. The needs of a particular medical facility are dictated by their patient base, not necessarily everybody who happens to be living in San Francisco. So i have some concerns about what would happen in land use terms because i dont want to put another barrier for development for Health Care Facilities might be beneficial to the city or to many people who are needing health care services. And in particular there was some talk about the obviously having a cultural diverse facility, but how specific
Closed well open up for commissioners questions and comments. Commissioner antonini . I have some questions in general about this document. There is a different between city owned medical facilities and noncity owned medical facilities. I guess my concern is that we talk about this eligible for Development Initiative and some things that would have to be met by institutions that qualify in terms of Square Footage New Buildings or additions. But, my concern is this where would this go . An example was brought up to changing a medical facility to pool hall. Im concerned about a medical facility who wanted to locate on the siting by the corridor on the street where you are told you cant do that because there are too many medical institutions. Many of our hospitals do not just deal with San Francisco residents. Many people come from outside the city for services at ucsf and kaiser and even as a dentist i have 30 percent of my patients who reside outside of San Francisco. The needs of a par