movies about this, e.t. , close encounters, indiana jones, crystal skull and coneheads and the earth stood still, one and two. the significance of the hawking speech that i heard was that he specifically referenced a july 1952 sighting over the united states coast guard station in washington, d.c. no astrophysicist of his credibility and reputation has ever actually mentioned a ufo sighting. so to us in that community, we sit up right away. and what we say is seti, please continue. maybe focus in on where there might be planets. please continue, but please also accept the fact that they may have been coming and going here for many years without calling seti back. in fact, i believe they re in violation of title 18, section 1202, paragraph a of the united states code, that says whoever abducts someone for ransom or otherwise is liable to criminal prosecution. and if you know the story of barney and betty hill, stanton friedman s book, herb
calling like they took barney and betty. larry: david, has nasa discovered anything? well, the we could go on for hours about paranoid theories like ufos. i personally find the ufo aliens unlikely because the number of cameras is doubling every single year, and the grays that they re talking about are such tedious boring versions of aliens. i support seth in that i have supported seti all my life. but i think it s been shown recently that seti needs to change track. seti has failed to see the garish, huge garish beacons that frank drake expected out there. seti should keep looking. they may be farther away. but it turns out that what we should be looking for is more of those wow signals. and you do that not with a single telescope, but with 10,000 amateur telescopes in backyards all over the world. and this system could make sure that all parts of the sky were
continue. maybe focus in on where there might be planets. please continue, but please also accept the fact that they may have been coming and going here for many years without calling seti back. in fact, i believe they re in violation of title 18, section 1202 paragraph a of the united states code which says whoever abducts someone for ransom or otherwise is liable to criminal prosecution. and if you know the story of barney and betty hill, stanton friedman s book, herb short-termer, the nebraska highway patrolman, he spoke of witnesses, callahan of the faa. larry: i got to get a break. you re making a strong point. one question i always ask, why did they land in wyoming? why not new york? i ll tell you that later. larry: or chicago. maybe we ll get answers, ahead. what did we make better ?
skull and coneheads tande the earth stood still one and two. the hawking speech that i heard is he specifically referenced a july 1952 sight over the united states coast guard station in washington, d.c. no astrophysicist of his credibility and reputation has ever actually mentioned a ufo sighting. so to us in that community, we sit up right away. and what we say is seti, please continue. maybe focus in on where there might be planets. please continue, but please also accept the fact that they may have been coming and going here for many years without calling seti back. in fact, i believe they re in violation of title 18, section 1202 paragraph a of the united states code which says whoever abducts someone for ransom or otherwise is liable to criminal prosecution. and if you know the story of barney and betty hill, stanton friedman s book, herb short-termer, the nebraska highway patrolman, he spoke of witnesses, callahan of the faa. larry: i got to get a break. you re making a strong