plus, it works well.people fewer people die on the operating table when you do it that way.when you do it for generations. this is how american society ran. if you were smart and you worked hard, you could compete. i m pretty much equal footing against anyone else in america.. they tell you that was neverallh true, but it was true. it was called the american o dream. the re moved here from allver oe the world to partake in that system. but there was a political problem with it. if you ve gooutt a mérida kraddc society, it s pretty hard to play race politics because raced to plays no role in advancement. individual initiative is what matters. group interests are irrelevant in a meritocracy. now,group in that may sound idyc to you. it may sound like the kind of country you d want to live in, but for the democraticcrat party, it was a disaster.ic p get your voters to the polls if they re not racially aggrieved? it s harde of. so at the tail end of the civilo rights move
reward americans based on the color of their skin. ironically, thiics waally ts precisely the evil practice that the civil rights movement was designed to abolish. racial discrimination wasabos unequivocally wrong. that was the whole point of the skirmish on the edmund pettus bridge in the march on washington. oh,of the but no, said democ, slyly repainting the slogans on the bar nn. ca actually , racial discrimination can be good. it alln be depends on who s beig discriminated against. that was their argument. natedthat is still their argumet more than 50 years later. but even now, after all of this time, most people, if you buplain it clearly, don t really buy it. wait, i can t have a job orhavea get into college j, get a federl contract because i was born with the wrong skin color. and f afat sounds wrong. and , of course, the right affirmative action is wrong. it s totally immoral. it s completely unfair.y unfairand now for the first timn years, the democratic party is bei