this way about a particular issue and covering something related to it, it is not that hard to screen it out of your coverage. it really isn t. lawyers do it every day. they represent clients that they think are guilty. judges decide in favor or against people they like or dislike all the time. it is not impossible. it is a discipline, a skill. but if you won t admit it to yourself, you have no chance. and it used to be that the editors of newspapers around the country really lead in those days by the new york times were very careful to make sure reporters wrote their stories in neutral language. that discipline, i m afraid, tucker, is out the window. the morning after the state of the union address by the president, the washington post had a banner headline that said, a discordant appeal for unity.t now they may have found this speech discordant, and i m sure that the journalist did, but that is an opinion. and the lead of the story said
correctly the jury had spoken, and your conclusion was we are all children of fdr now. we are indeed. the american people political scientists have been saying for 50 years our rhetorical conservatives and operational liberals talk like jeffersonians that government is best and least and vote consistently for hamilton tonians. the word socialism is bandied and redefined but if it means redistribution of government of wealth 66% of the governments transfer payments. the sky is dark with checks going back and forth. that s what the government does. it s good to know there s still a few conservatives left in washington, d.c. tom perez. by the time, katty kay had a great line in 2009, when newsweek had this banner headline that said, are we all socialists now? and katty said, being from britains said you americans make
number one is a freeze frame from fox coverage this week. look at their banner headline. fbi didn t explain that lying would put flynn in legal jeopardy. that s not in jest. that was put on the screen seriously. required general mark hertling was on twitter today saying this as a former lieutenant general, i can attest that one learns not to lie to the fbi much earlier in one s career and much lower in rank. you get my drift. do you think this was all for the federal judge, and was this federal judge ever going to have my of this argument that he was somehow set up? i think it could actually undermine his case for real leniency in the case. and look, anybody who watches television you don t have to be a lieutenant general. you don t have to have been in the intelligence field. you know you re not supposed to lie to the fbi. it s such a ridiculous
sanctions with kislyak? they gave him every chance to walk away from his earlier statement and he did exactly the opposite. he doubled down. i don t see how that counts as a perjury trap under any definition of the term so donna edwards, this mueller filing today was as if they heard this fiction developing and wanted to correct it. that means there s an audience of one, a federal judge. number one is a freeze frame from fox coverage this week. look at their banner headline. fbi didn t explain that lying would put flynn in legal jeopardy. that s not in jest. that was put on the screen seriously. retired general mark hurtical was on twitter today saying this. as a former lieutenant general, i can attest that one learns not to lie to the fbi much earlier in one s career and at a much
kislyak about the sanctions. they knew that, in fact, he had. so they went to go ask him, are you sure you didn t talk about sanctions with kislyak? because they knew that he had. and he reaped the lie that he had voluntarily made two weeks before. they gave him every chance to walk away from his earlier statement, and did he exactly the opposite. he doubled down. i don t see how that counts as a perjury trap under any definition of the term. so donna edwards, again this mueller filing today was as if they heard this fiction developing and wanted to correct it. of course, that means there s an audience of one and it s a federal judge. i want to show you two things. number one is a freeze frame from fox coverage this week and look at their banner headline. fbi didn t explain that lying would put flynn in legal jeopardy. that s not in jest. that was put on the screen seriously.