could enjoy our freedoms. i wanted to remember them this weekend. for sure. in answer to your question, this really isn t about policy. this is about a president who lies and defrauds the entire country. this is a man who ran for office based on demonizing immigrant, calling them rapists, calling them thugs, who first thing he did was try to ban muslims. he s locked children in cages, and now we learn, we learn that he himself profits off of the exploitation of undocumented workers at his own golf clubs. so when we talk about children, you know, coming over the border and not being treated properly, this is a we have a con man that is running the country. so none of this is surprising. it s horrific as it is. and what we are witnessing, what we ve been witnessing for the
he s accused of killing an iraqi police officer in sacramento but he came to the united states as a refugee and he was able to apply for a green card! isn t this exactly why the president wanted an aggressive travel ban and aggressive betting? of course, we ve heard that this constant refrain of , welcoma warning from the left braids because we know the root of his poisonous tree was his attempt to ban muslims. this will not make us safer. they are all muslim countries, the majority, and they are banned because of that. it serves no purpose, and in fact, i would argue, it is entirely negative in terms of national security. it potentially could cut off areas of intelligence that could help us protect ourselves from a violent extremism. laura: congressman, what can you tell us about this case? into our viewers are very concerned about this. they should be very concerned. contrast this, here i am yesterday, giving a speech supporting the president and our ability to protect his
suspected isis member. he s accused of killing an iraqi police officer in sacramento but he came to the united states as a refugee and he was able to apply for a green card! isn t this exactly why the president wanted an aggressive travel ban and aggressive vetting? of course, we ve heard that this constant refrain of, well, a warning from the left. we know the root of this poisonous tree was his attempt to ban muslims. this will not make us safer. they are all muslim countries, the majority, and they are banned because of that. it serves no purpose, and inm fact, i would argue, it is entirely negative in terms of national security. it potentially could cut off areas of intelligence that could help us protect ourselves from a violent extremism. laura: congressman, what can you tell us about this case? asknow our viewers are very concerned about this. they should be very concerned. contrast this, here i am yesterday, giving a speech supporting the president and our ability to
restricts to varying degrees of five muslim countries. as well as two non-muslim majority countries. its point and efficacy is not vetting and cleaning up what you just heard the president say, he hoped to do from the start to ban muslims. joining me is senator richard blumenthal. senator, i know you oppose the supreme court ruling. this was a legal and political victory for the president. it was a victor for the president and not for america. i say this with sadness, who argued cases before the supreme court, i have great reverence and respect. but today it is abandoned its
ruling of the supreme court today? the majority looked at this as a case about the presidency, about the power of all presidents. and treated this executive order as if it was something as an i am m immaculate conception. it doesn t say anything about muslims, it refers to these seven countries. and the supreme court said in light of that, it s perfectly permissible. the decenters, said who are you kidding? this is the muslim ban in a tutu. basically prohibiting muslims to come into the united states. and drew on the comments that you said earlier. this is why it matters who is on the supreme court and who