and it s not islamophobic to worry about it. i am talking about terror threats, rioting, massive spikes in crime it. people lie about them. it is totally measurable. here s what i object to, do you think this is the best way to protect our country? you write it off as islamophobic or bigoted for people to haveay these concerns. let s talk about what was onf the table. during the president s campaign, president trump repeatedly no secret to anyone said he wanted a total and complete shutdown of muslims entry to the united states united states. tucker: that is correct. this he actually spoke to former new york city mayor rudy giuliani, again a matter of record, and looked for a way to make it look legal. to be able to do the muslim ban that he wanted.
speculate. probably 13 or 14 other countries, and not all of them muslim countries and not all of them in the middle east that have very questionable vetting procedures that we can rely on, and if we overlay additional vetting procedures, the chances are those countries, there will be minimum citizens from there visiting our country. he is stressing it s all about the vetting. what is the difference between this travel ban and the first one. here it goes? legal permanent residents, people who already had valid visas won t be affected by this. what is taken out of the order? we see language that indicated preferential treatment from minorities like christians were taken out, and syrian refugees are lumped in now with the 120-day refugee ban, and john and poppy, a lot of groups we
questions. take two of the trump travel as far as i m concerned, ban means round two over its every investigation conducted by the department of justice is an legality. concede now that this revised independent investigation. can t get the tape on the ban is more narrowly focused and more carefully written, but they air. we ll come back to that. will still challenge it on the new deputy attorney general grounds it is to them a thinly will say every investigation is vailed muslim ban. independent, and dianne feinstein pressed her case that the revised ban issued by the they should have an independent counsel. that one does not have the gas right now. president is the muslim ban 2.0. even some democrats privately saying why don t we let the intelligence committee investigations go forward first. it is a reincarnation of the we ll see if there s anything there, and at that point we have original failed and flawed that conversation. muslim ban that was blocked by chuck grassley,
tucker: it s not even close to a muslim ban. trump himself called at thate tucker: is this a ban of all muslims? it is not but it is the political firepower that he got out of this, was using the term muslim ban tucker: i thought you weree the one using that word. what contaminates the executive order tucker: it doesn t apply tont most of the world s muslims. the point, here is the only point i am making. it s not about trump or what is in his heart.po it is about the tens of millions of other americans who support this they are not supporting islamophobia. they are saying maybe there s a
make it look legal. to be able to do the muslim ban that he wanted. tucker: it s not even close to a muslim ban. trump himself called at that. tucker: is this a ban of all muslims? it is not but it is the political firepower that he got out of this, was using the term muslim ban tucker: i thought you were the word who the one using thad word. what contaminates the executive order tucker: it doesn t apply to most of the world s muslims. the point, here is the only point i am making. it s not about trump or what is in his heart. it is about the tens of millions of other americans who support this they are not supposed sg