the presidential immunity question as well as the ballot question, and clarence thomas is involved in both those decisions, does it call into question to some extent the outcome of the rulings from the high court? well, he s recused himself on certain other january 6th-related cases. so even to follow his own guidance, he should recuse. if he doesn t, it does lead to, obviously to concerns that he is not an unbiased justice simply following the facts and the law. and that s what we expect of our justices. whatever their political leengs, they are supposed to apply the facts in the law. adhere to the precedents and render a judgment unrelated to their partisan, political views. the american public has doubts
Three decades ago, it was nearly an even match. Abortion-rights proponents and anti-abortion activists — at the culmination of a dramatic three-year political battle in the halls of the State House and across Maryland — turned out thousands of volunteers and flooded the airwaves with ads, spending practically dollar-for-dollar in the lead-up to the 1992 election. "Privacy, safety, choice," the .
Three decades ago, it was nearly an even match. Abortion-rights proponents and anti-abortion activists — at the culmination of a dramatic three-year political battle in the halls of the State House and across Maryland — turned out thousands of volunteers and flooded the airwaves with ads, spending practically dollar-for-dollar in the lead-up to the 1992 election. “Privacy, safety, choice,” the .