SUBJECT WISE INDEXAdvocateSupreme Court shocked to see lawyer filing Article 32 petition against state to recover legal fees. Vijay Kumar Shukla v. State of U.P., 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 523Civil.
Judgment/OrdersSupreme Court Grants Interim Protection To Teesta Setalvad For 7 Days ; Stays HC Order After Special Night SittingCase title- Teesta Atul Setalvad v. State of Gujarat Citation-SLP.
Gurugram Prime Plot Sold Through Fake GPA: Supreme Court Forms SIT To Probe Land Scam; Questions Role Of Sub-Registrar s OfficeCase title: Pratibha Manchanda And Anr. v. State of Haryana And.
The Supreme Court observed that, in cases where injuries are caused by firearms, the failure to examine Ballistic Expert would be a glaring defect when the prosecution case is based on circumstantial.
into the doghouse and was found in the dog bed. so they have that. and what they did not do is take that projectile and dig projectiles out of the berm where the shooting range was and compare it to see if they match. and notice he said the ballistic expert can t be 100% sure until you have the gun. you heard my cross examination of agent greer and this tool mark ballistic examination is somewhat soft science. coming under criticism. it is what they rely upon. not every investigative lab relies upon it. that s what they did here. but it is not gospel. it is not gospel. another thing about the about