for the court do. to the specific acts. yes. if the court holds there is presidential immunity, which it should, then remand to the district court to say, okay, go through the indictment and hold factual findings to find out how it applies to the conduct in this case. the court has the discretion to do that and that would be a natural course. if there are no further questions i have one more question. under the framework established in discussed in nixon versus fitzgerald, we re supposed to conduct a balancing test where we balance the need for the asserted immunity versus other public interests. and i see you as trying to represent a need for tecutive t to facilitate executive functions. the ability to act without hesitation, to be fearless, to make decision-making with to make decisions without being inhibited by the fear of
different cases they re working on and this is a tough balancing test for him through 2024 and possibly beyond trying to balance all of the legal casework with the usual behind the scenes antics and chaos of trump world with all of these critical election deadlines. next week we get oral arguments before a federal appeals court and this is in donald trump s effort to get immunity in the federal election fraud case here and they will lay them out and then it becomes how quickly does this appeals court make a decision? that is exactly right and the timing is the question and the constitutional arguments that they re going to make. i talked to one of his former attorneys over the weekend and he told us live on air, this immunity argument, this is not going to win. the goal here is to try to delay this case until after the 2024 election and it is unclear how successful they ll be, if this will take enough time to
the supreme court held that is illegal and unconstitutional. my organization sent a warning letter to every single law school in america and next we will do medical schools and after that we will do undergraduate schools. we said if you continue to use a racial balancing test, by hook or crook or any means to try to stack the deck towards one race in admissions, then we are going to take you to court. in this country it doesn t matter what your skin color is. racial bigotry is wrong. you know, it also relies, especially the disadvantaged template, relies on that being maintained. that if you are only able to get into college because you have been disadvantaged in various elements of society, there is then an incentive to be disadvantaged. which is a horrible dynamic. greg, we have got here, especially with aoc, it is
you know, maybe who are people of color, but certainlopley pers are more inclined to move along the leftist agenda, etc.. thi where do you think is this going to stop or is this going to take more lawsuits and is it going to be a big, big problem>y ? everything you said, tammy, is completely correcg yot. so uc davis, as an example, uses a disadvantage score.disadn they prioritize applicants who say they ve experienced more disadvantages, but they re just using that as a diproxy for race to achieve a racial balancing test. becau so what you re going to see, because the left has they have no respect for the supremeth. i mean, you heard the quote from aoc what leftwing universities are going to do is they are going to create all arese proxy tests, allthese pr e pretexts, but they are trying to achieve the sam te racial balancing to keep poor whites out, to keep asians, out to try to have an artificial racial for admissions that is illegal,
that is unconstitutional. the supreme court has held that that is illegal and unconstitutional. so tha my organization, america first legal, sent a warning letter to every single a law school in america. and next, we re going to do medical schools. and after that , we re also going to do undergraduate schools. and we ve said if you continue ra to use a racial balancing test by hook or crook, by any to try to stack the deck towardsission one race in admissions, then we are going to take you tos, cour, because in this country, it doesn t matter what your skin colokin color is. racial bigotry is wrong. you it s it also relies, especially the disadvantaged template. es it relies on that being maintained that ifn you are going to only be able to get into a college because you youvd have been disadvantaged in various elements of societ iy. s there is then an incentivee to be disadvantaged, which is a horrible dynamic. gregnamic., we ve got here, especially with aoc. it s interesting that she