and, you know, this is these are very credible reporters. we are deep in the realm now of credibly impeachable offenses. there are an awful lot of similarities. a couple of articles of impeachment against nixon and the elements of this story. impeachment would actually allow him to at least do what he loves which is to be and pretend he a is the victim and the democrats are this and that but at the end of the day, i think the impeachment process, ifnk there are, you know, this these facts are corroborated in today s report, i actually just don t seee how congress can do anything else. sean: all right. you would think by now the so-called journalists in the echo chamber, the extension of the democratic party would have learned their lesson. they have been burned so many times before in the last two years. remember, s the short life hysteria about npr s baker don jr. story? remember the hype surrounding michael cohen s secret prom trip it neveroh
fake news as such and for them to ever get their credibility back, i don t think it s even possible. look, we learned about baker. we know about andrew mccabe. we know about strzok and page, they were even appointed to mueller s team, along with jeannie ray, who used to be the attorney, and the, andrew weissmann. here s my question, bruce ohr we learned under oath and released in testimony this week that he warned everybody about the phony dossier. he warned that clinton b paid for it, he warned thatne christopher steele had a hatred for the president. he warned it wasn t verified or corroborated. but it still became the bulk of information. yeah, i have always asked the question of what about what happens to the evidence that was gathered during the course of the proceedings, the investigations, that were outside legal parameters, not appropriate, not legal? because it s all from the fruit of the poisonous tree.