him on that issue, wants to shield his time at bain capital from any criticism, they want to make it an asset only, nothing bad could be said. no matter how much they want to do that, the criticism of his time at bain isn t made up, it s real been around for a long time, even though the establishment succeeded in shutting down other republican candidates from talking about it, the republican party establishment cannot shut up everybody and the problems with bain are on main stream journalistic journal. it s in the wall street journal, reuter, tampa bay times, there is stuff to be reported on. since launching his campaign, about how great he will be on the economy because of his business experience, real questions have been raised and whether or not it s an asset, makes people more or less likely to vote for him. mr. romney has been clum si to the point of pitiful on adirection the inevitable questions how rich that work at bain made him. questions about all his wealth and what he has d
will be good on the economy. since then, that assertion, that justification for his campaign has been really tested. mitt romney is not campaigning on the basis of his time as massachusetts governor. in fact, he talks about himself as if that time never even happened in his life. you have to choose someone who is not been a life-long politician. for me, politics is not a career. for me, my career was being in business and starting a business and making it successful. pay no attention to my times as governor and all the other times i ran for office and failed. the basis for mitt romney s central claim that he would be better at dealing with the economy is his private sector experience, his time in business. well, mitt romney s time in business was his time at bain capital. however much the republican establishment wants to protect him on that issue, wants to shield his time at bain capital from any criticism, they want to make it an asset only, nothing bad could ever be said about i