the pain becomes a part of you everybody, to my house, now. his entire family, gone. i said what are you talkin about, what do you saying? and i really hear it was surreal his fellow cops suspected him. i did not do this, i did not d this she was upset she felt like history wa repeating itself he wants to have women an his wife was in his way. we are police wrong it s like the twilight zone lies become truth and the trut becomes lies maybe the real killer was still out there. you have lied to the police about this case? yes, sir. so devastating. we probably knew that thi was the key to solving this. 13 years, 13 years such an awful crime. the wife the little boy and girl. shot at point blank range. i was just dumbfounded, shocked at what i saw. how to comprehend what do you talking about what do you saying? the husband had an alibi. for ten minutes. he could have done anything he did 13 years, three trials, repeals, reversals and changin st
print, charles, is just wher you brace your selves to lea across and shoot that s according to the defense expert witness you ve got to understand the prosecution has that sam evidence they don t see it that way what i m saying, if you r so concerned about tidying up, why would you be so clumsies to leave a bagel handprint o the vehicle? i lean into check on th children what i seen there wa horrifying i m not worried about that pal print. i didn t even realize i left a palm print do you think that if i had not known, i would ve taken th time to wipe that off? i want to just get out o there. did you touch any law victims, charles no, i did not so how does he explain hi touch dna on kim and she l camm s close i touch david camm. we shook hands, any handled my sweatshirt my skin shells are clearly o him. so, anything he touches can be transferred. well the defense could no tell the jury about boney past, the foot fetish, the armed robberies, we knew the record and asked h
this beautiful woman, dead lifeless on the ground but then boney said h stumbled over the woman s shoes, and took the time to place the on top of the bronco but then you are down on the, floor at the way you tell. it you ve tripped. yeah, i did i tripped over the shoes and then your emotions ar going crazy. the skies trying to kill you re in a crime scene. you have to stop, you think, shoes, i have to put these o top of the vehicle charles, that doesn t make any sense. no, no, no, here s th thing. i m wiping the shoes off and i see one little laker something hanging out of the passenger side i don t investigate to see i there s anyone else in the bac of the vehicle i when i lean into look, i put the shoes on top i don t even remember doing. it doesn t remember doing it, and he says he doesn t kno why. i wasn t thinking about why i did that but i was cognizant, and reall thinking about the dna o possible fingerprints from having tripped and touch those shoes. but you kno
i clearly touch something that is now a part of what will now be a murder scene. so, yeah, i did pick up. i did try to wipe them down. kim s shoes, he placed them on top of the bronco then he looked inside th vehicle and said he saw the tw children mindful of leaving dna and prince, he said he touched o the bodies then he said he heard davi moving inside the house. and he clicked into my head he s going for a weapon. i mean, this guy is a former indiana state trooper. i wish point, he bolted fro the scene. had i stay there any longer there is no doubt he would v killed me. and he would ve just slide and said to his buddies at the indiana state police, i came home and i found this blac eye. after listening to bone testify, the defense was ready to pounce. that s his story. and it makes absolutely no sense. but it explains away all the evidence they had against hi at the time. but what boney did not account for is the dna that was goin to be found, and he has no
it s not necessaril awkward. but we have to go with the physical evidence. and the physical evidence is not like this. but why so few spots? bellow said it s because mos of the blow back was in th inside roof of the vehicle like much of the other evidence, the blood spatter testimony wa essentially the same as in the other two trials what would be enormously different this time was th star witness the jury was going to hear fro charles boney himself. a huge risk for prosecutor lefko. so, you can wonder how good this witness boney is going to be for you yes, certainly hi credibility was not bein questioned why put him on the stand? and i felt like i did not have a choice. if i did not put him on th stand, i suspect they woul have but i suspect the jury ought t hear them. this is the story boney tol in court he said he met david camm in 2000, playing basketball in local park we talk to boney in prison it was just a pickup game o basketball and i didn t know him or reall