circumstances. there is no down side to offend the americans or put somebody in jail who helped us for life hecht won t outlive the sentence. yet, they calculate if you want to appease in some way jihaddist, it won t hurt you. i think the strategic announcement of a withdrawal,dy fintive withdrawal certainly makes it easy for the other guys to offend us in a way that they. bret: so what about that? there is a big push about the blind dissident in china. secretary clinton talked about this today. how far is this administration going to go when it comes to getting doctor out? i think they really need to go pretty far for the reasons that chuck and charles mentioned. you cannot be recruiting foreign agents if you are not foining to do evening you can, agents abroad to help them. i think it affects the
justice; thus, none will go over and it will be overturned. bret: 5-4? yes. i hate to sound like charles puppet but his analysis is scintillatingly correct. i thought from the beginning 5-4 to strike down the mandate. the only really difficult question in my mind is how much of the law will to down with the mandate. on that one, i think that kennedy is the likeliest conservative to in effect go over to the other side in the sense he might just settle for a small slice of it. bret: bill? i think the chief justice will call it way he sees it. you get calculations about the legitimacy and reverse calculations but i don t like attacks on me, he knows that is a bad way to be a supreme court justice and bad way for supreme court, so i think they will vote the way they think is correct on constitutional grounds and strike it down
pakistan policy. for a few years now, i had long conversations off the record, very senior administration officials who tell the hair-raising tales of dough policety a betrayal duplicity and betrayal by the intelligence services in particular. i think that is horrible. shouldn t we cut off all the aid to them? shouldn t we pressure them? drone strikes in the territory without their permission? oh, no. we need to get along with pakistan. ehave been half convinced until now. they cut off supply lines to troops in gaseous sitroops in ax months ago. we managed to fly the troops and we don t need the supply lines the way we once did. a strong case for tougher policy. if they treat us this way we need to make them pay a price. bret: chuck, you mentioned the senate appropriation committee action. lindsay graham talked about this. but you can hear the
he met with obama and karzai but refused to free up the truck. the senate voted to cut pakistan aid $1 million for each year for the doctor s 33-year sentence. king thinks the house will follow suit. it s hard to justify relationship with pakistan. i know we need transportation routes. but we find them as double agents. to hold us up. the officials accuse them of overreacting. saying you got bin laden and we re happy he got killed but the way it was done we the president like that. bret: wendell goler, thank you. stocks ended the week on a sour note. dow dropped 75. s&p 500 lost three. nasdaq finished down two. campaign rhetoric can be nasty but not as gross as it was today.
charging they sent a text message to say this our guy. but king is right to say the way the administration was boasting about the raid to talk about it in detail within hours taking the oath of secrecy is disgraceful. they did talk about right away the dna. the pakistanis will ask how do you have the dna? go to a medical team? go to doctors on the scene in the place? it s not hard to find the guy they eventually arrested. now sentence. yes, i think the administration tepely at fault. there is another element here. if you are a pakistani, you are making the decisions. they are cold calculations. who do you want to to fen or not want to offend in jihaddist in the country be there for many, many years. the americans are leaving. obama ran up the white flag at the they know summit saying we are leighing under all