an energy company that had been in the sights of the ousted prosecutor general. is that a fair statement? i don t think that s an accurate statement. su know, he had been in the sights of the prosecutor general in 2014. that s not the prosecutor general that we re talking about here. we re talking about a prosecutor general that took the job in 2015. the case was dismissed before that prosecutor general actually became the prosecutor general. it was his predecessors who dismissed the case in early 2015. before he took the job. so you know, actually i m not sure that that s an accurate statement. is it fair to sum up your look at this, by saying bad opt optics, but no underlying fire? i would say my take away is that it was a questionable decision by hunter to do this. but when you compare it to what s happening, what s happened by you know with giuliani and the president have done in terms of trying to twist