businesses, national businesses that take in $100,000 in contributions from foreign governments or foreign companies and a $200 billion program and has not put a single penny into any campaign and to be accused by the president of the united states and vice president of the united states when they know there s no evidence there is outrageous. it would be me like saying when obama outspent john mccain by 3-1 last time he had mexican drug money in there. i can t prove it, but i throw the charge out there. they re not factual. i want you to answer what ed just said. i want you to listen to karl rove, one of the people who has associated with some outside groups. he says he s not involved on a day-to-day basis but has been an adviser and consultant and makes ed s point, saying, look, if you can t show me where that s bad money don t lower the esteem of the office of the presidency. does the president have such little regard for the office that he holds that he goes out there and make
the only complete multivitamin with soy isoflavones to help address hot flashes and mild mood changes. new one a day menopause formula. the white house acknowledges it has zero evidence that any foreign money is used against democrats in this year s campaigns. that hasn t stopped team obama from raising the specter of shady dealings by chamber of commerce and other administration krcritics. vice president challenged it to tell us how much of the money they re investing is from foreign sources. the vp s remarks today ek ochoe the president s warnings at a sunday rally in philadelphia. it could be the oil industry, could be the insurance industry, could be foreign-owned orp rati corporations. you don t know, because they don t have to disclose. now, that s not just a threat to democrats, that s a threat to
pollster who admitted they re throwing everything up against the wall to see what sticks in this campaign. they re doing that. he said when you ask voters whether they want any foreign money in american elections, they say absolutely not. and it kind of sets them off. would everyone like real full disclosu disclosure? yes. did the supreme court rule a way the democrats disagree with? yes. is there enough disclosure? the foreign money is the keyword and they think it gins up their base attacking karl rove and the bush cronies as they call some of them. if they have no evidence of foreign money not only that, their base, i was talking to a democratic strategist involved in some of these groups try to compete with the republican side saying there are people in middle america who think chamber of commerce, wait a minute, i know the people in my local town who work in the chamber of commerce, what s he
talk about is the influx of outside money into the campaign and the president s assertion that maybe just maybe some of it is coming from overseas. a lot more also to come on the program tonight. another thing the president wants to do is spend billions of dollars on new infrastructure. he says europe, china, everywhere else spend a lot more and you re stuck in heavy traffic. do you want your tax dollars spent to try to fix it? we ll discuss new york s controversial republican candidate for governor, carl paladino now says some homosexuals are home washed. he doesn t want children brainwashed to be homosexuals. we ll break down what he s trying to say. pete on the street is was. he s got question time for me. pete s back in new york playing up the holiday. receiving the bronze star, that was definitely one of my proudest moments. i graduated from west point, then i did a tour of duty in iraq. when i was transitioning from active duty, i went to a military officer hiring conference.
our democracy. the chamber says none of its political activities are funded by foreign sources and accuses the white house of a desperate smear campaign and the chamber own other conservative groups say there are liberal organizations also taking advantage of a supreme court decision that doesn t require groups to disclose donors. what is the political impact? should there be more disclosure? with us, roland and ed. is this a bad thing not only that so much money is coming in, the supreme court says it s free speech, let it in, but never mind us in washington or us consultants that somebody living in the state of ohio or state of texas or state of california doesn t know who s trying to influence their vote. this is irresponsible the charges that are made. i m not against disclosure. disclosure law is not in existence today. to charge the chamber of commerce, neighborhood businesses, community