days ago and that the special ops guys, the afghan commandos, they spread them thin in many of these capitals, these provincial capitals and they were fighting and they were dying. and they were trying to defend their homeland. so, this notion that the taliban showed up at every place and the afghans handed over their weapons is not true. that s one thing i noticed in the past couple days is people trying to connect that narrative and that intelligence, that statement on background statement. that seemed to me to be a little bit course correction on that idea, as well. but another, you know, while there were some afghans who were putting up a fight in certain places, particularly in kandahar and there was also this momentum that built with the taliban over the past couple weeks that really, really started to take off in the last week or two. that was as one place would fall, as one province would fall then they were able to gather up more people, they were emptying
Винні всі! | Газета «День»
day.kyiv.ua - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from day.kyiv.ua Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
department in advancing their own personal agenda? no. i don t know if he knows who the sources are in our story. but the only thing i d point out is that in our story, we say that a spokeswoman for the justice department provided us with a background statement from someone that was in the room who said that rosenstein had said this. they don t contest the fact that he had said this but that it was done sarcastically. and that is in our story but as we pointed out earlier, the rosenstein was asked in the meeting whether he was kidding. and he said he wasn t. that s where we ended up on our reporting and we feel comfortable. rosenstein is in a very difficult spot where he has to explain why this happened. in many ways, he sees himself as the protector of mueller. so i guess that s where we end up with this statement.
not sure if that s meant to reassure any of us. but an interesting parse denial. do you have any idea who he s talking about when he references anonymous sources who are obviously biased against the department in advancing their own personal agenda? no. i don t know if he knows who the sources are in our story. but the only thing i d point out is that in our story, we say that a spokeswoman for the justice department provided us with a background statement from someone that was in the room who said that rosenstein had said this. they don t contest the fact that he had said this but that it was done sarcastically. and that is in our story but as we pointed out earlier, the rosenstein was asked in the meeting whether he was kidding. and he said he wasn t. that s where we ended up on our reporting and we feel comfortable. rosenstein is in a very difficult spot where he has to explain why this happened. in many ways, he sees himself as the protector of mueller.
those moments for you. let s go back further than that. we could go, james comey was fired and the president got very upset about the fact that his communications shop didn t seem to have an instantaneous plan in place. we were left to run around and collect as much information as we got at that point. last night, we had h.r. mcmaster, the national security advisor, come out about two hours after the news broke about the russian story. tonight we have a background statement from the white house. apparently they are now, at least the medications staff, in a meeting with the white house correspondents association. correspondents aren t even being allowed into the upper press office to see any senior officials paired but they ve got to get something out on this quickly because they are losing the ware narrative. we have these democrats on capitol hill who are saying we need to get to the bottom of
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.