We have our votes already for the most part. Need to be going into africanamerican churches. Into theo be going hispanic communities and the barrio to make sure jeb and policy right on this, we need to go there first to listen. What they want is to be listened to. Listening is empowering. First we have to listen. And our party has failed in going into those places because we have said, well we dont get instant gratification back, therefore why go there . We narrow our sites. The fact that these folks know that we were troubled and they want to hear from everyone, we need to go up there and campaign and show up. For jeb bush,it ben carson, and chris christie. Thank you senator. Thank you. [applause] thanks for coming. There is more road to the white house coverage coming up later today with republican candidate donald trump. He will be speaking to supporters at a rally in clear lake, iowa. We will have that at 5 p. M. Eastern here on cspan. Students around the country are working on csp
Note. You can participate in todays that by using the comments section of the youtube page or on twitter but using the hashtag dpc live. Our team will be monitoring those feeds them up as long or questions to our house. So now i turn over to ellen gilmer to start a conversation. , and thanks everybody for joining us today. Its kind of a wild time tracking immigration policy, there is a lot going on. There is very active Court Dockets in the state and we are very lucky to have our guests here to give their insights. For me it is so helpful to learn from all these people, either following their feeds on twitter , they have their finger on the pulse of what is going on in the immigration policy space. Our panelists include an immigration attorney who is a former was formerly the Deputy Assistant attorney general for the office of immigration litigation. He provided litigation Risk Assessment to cabinet members in that role and also also oversaw litigation on immigration in that role, so h
Here on cspan. President trump en travel bans and ending dhaka and President Biden. Just yesterday the Biden Administration issued a final role to fortify the daca program against current legislation. The state of texas which is certain currently suing the government over the legality of the program. Those of us who have been in the immigration policy world for a while found the new generation of litigation different from the kinds of court cases that have dominated policy in the 21st century. One aspect of the changes who is suing the federal government. Namely states with and their attorneys general, often with a partisan angle. Republican states are suing democratic president s, and vice versa. And the use of injunctions by judges who can halt or restart a program overnight across the country. All of this has come at the same time that Congress Seems to be unable to have anything with the word immigration to pass anything with the word immigration in it. What does this mean for fede
They also talk about potential litigation on the horizon. Good afternoon and welcome to the event on the expanded mandate of the courts. Anyone who has followed immigration issues will have noted the increase in headline grabbing immigration stories about federal courts stopping immigration programs. Several highprofile cases have come down on significant policies initiated by president obama and daca, President Trump and travel bans and ending daca and President Biden. Just yesterday the Biden Administration issued a final rule to fortify the daca program against current legislation. Most experts believe it is unlikely to go into effect because certainly, the state of texas, which is currently suing the government over the legality of the program, will ask for it to be stayed. Those of us who have been in the immigration policy world for a while find the new generation of litigation different from the kinds of court cases that have dominated policy in the 21st century. One aspect of t
Center, live coverage here on cspan. And President Biden on the remain in Mexico Program to name a few. Just yesterday, the Biden Administration issued a final rule meant to fortify the program against current litigation. Most experts believe it is unlikely to go into effect. Certain currently suing the government over the legality of the program. Those of us who have been in the immigration policy world for a while found the new generation of litigation different from the kinds of court cases that have dominated policy in the 21st century. One aspect of the changes who is suing the federal government. Namely states with and their attorneys general, often with a partisan angle. Republican states are suing democratic president s, and vice versa. And the use of injunctions by judges who can halt or restart a program overnight across the country. All of this has come at the same time that Congress Seems to be unable to have anything with the word immigration to pass anything with the word