so dangerous for a senior u.s. official to be mixing his own personal business interests and financial needs with government policy? so it s not about what you think it was about. the background check isn t about the fbi looking at your answers on a form, going into the field to vet them out and deciding if you have the sufficient character or leadership skills to be a white house aid. that s up to the staff to decide. they go out with a single purpose. the reason for your fbi field investigation, the reason they go out and check the answers they give on the initial form or more advanced one is to see if you re a potential target for blackmail. jared kushner as of today has not proven he s not a potential target for blackmail. you are a target if you ve done anything that you would take great measures to assure didn t become public or wasn t made known to your home government or law enforcement. that s right.
interests alongside u.s. policy interests. that s a serious allegation. we ve got other u.s. intelligence intercepts described in the washington post tonight where four different countries describes what makes him vulnerable including personal financial difficulties, business interests and pursuit of foreign investors for his family s business interest while he s been associated with the trump campaign and administration. here is my question, why is it so dangerous for a senior u.s. official to be mixing his own personal business interests and financial needs with government policy? so it s not about what you think it was about. the background check isn t about the fbi looking at your answers on a form, going into the field to vet them out and deciding if you have the sufficient character or leadership skills to be a white house aid. that s up to the staff to decide. they go out with a single purpose. the reason for your fbi field investigation, the reason they go out and check the
said she said. yet in this white house is not horror and revulsion, but a determination to protect the abuser, rob porter. it is surprising what s been happening in this white house. frankly, the white house s claim that he is denying the allegations therefore he should have his day in court. if you re the fbi, the denial itself is actually more troubling given the amount of substantiation you have of this domestic violence. what it suggests is he s trying to deceive about what actually happened there. and in a position of trust and confidence and in an fbi background investigation, you want to know that that individual is going to be forthcoming and truthful with your investigators. and he wasn t doing that. that is a big security red flag. do you think that this is enough of a security threat that the committees should want to ensure that someone without clearances with something that could certainly be lorded over him, like i said at the top, the background check isn t for the f
thompson. i found this out it made me angry. and i wasn t angry at dylann the system. some have longer waiting periods and a former official says that would help nation wide. sims three days you just can t determine a person s absolute legal status to purchase a gun. some big firearms dealers including walmart will not sell a gun even after the three-day waiting period if the background check isn t finished. now the director says this kind of failure because of a mistake in the data base is rare but he lass ordered an immediate review to find out what changes should be made. thanks for that. new overnight lawmakers in greece approve add new reform package. the parliament voted on the proposal early this morning and includes cutting pensions and raising taxes. today negotiators for greece will head to brussels to seek a