commission to send his case back tojudges. but in 2010 an investigator concluded: there is nothing to be gained by having any of the dna exhibits re tested yet again. in 2012, the ccrc dismissed mr malkinson s application one of two rejections he received. that dna sample has since been linked to an identifiable suspect. it s not the only problem in this case and mr malkinson wants full disclosure. it should be open, not defensive. you know, if things were done wrong, just be open about it, like a truth and reconciliation committee. because you re only going to fix these things if you get to the heart of what s going wrong. he and his team have welcomed the inquiry but say that if anyone obstructs it, it must be given powers to force disclosure of evidence. they say trust in justice itself is at stake. sophie. hundreds of thousands