reading the tea leaves i guess i mean they want to wrap this up. i can t blame them. they ve had their 4th of july holiday ruined. do you think it means that they think they ve heard enough of this, they know how they re going to vote? i mean, i ve never seen that kind of rushing by a jury. i think that they certainly know what they think about the voice i.d. issue and knew that prior going into today. i bet their minds are getting more and more set. as christopher said, we have a rule of law, we have a very high burden in criminal cases for a reason, no matter what the color of any party and in the usa, you don t get convicted typically on evidence that is not better than this. so i think it going to be a not guilty verdict likely, unless they feel pressured to split the baby, maybe come back manslaughter. but i think the defense did a really good job today of probably inoculating themselves against a compromise verdict.
day three. nothing. what were you thinking then? by that point i was afraid they were going to come back manslaughter. i was that concerned. on the fourth day of deliberations the jury reached a verdict. we the jury dually impanelled and formed in the above entitled action upon our oath do find the defendant as to count one first-degree murder a domestic violence offense as to victim noor faleh haul not guilt. we find the defendant as to count one second degree murder guilty. in other words, the jury did not agree that this was a premeditated murder. it was not an honor killing. a tee feet fo defeat for the p. for the injuries suffered by the family friend the jury found al-malecki guilty of
day three. nothing. what were you thinking then? by that point i was afraid they were going to come back manslaughter. i was that concerned. on the fourth day of deliberations the jury reached a verdict. we the jury dually impanelled and formed in the above entitled action upon our oath do find the defendant as to count one first-degree murder a domestic violence offense as to victim noor faleh haul not guilt. we find the defendant as to count one second degree murder guilty. in other words, the jury did not agree that this was a premeditated murder. it was not an honor killing. a tee feet fo defeat for the p. for the injuries suffered by the family friend the jury found al-malecki guilty of
earth and all in the name of honor. when you made your closing arguments did you think i have got this case sewn up? i never have that level of confidence but i he knew i had some jurors in our pocket. did faleh intend to hurt any one? no. al-malecki s lawyer argued this was not a premeditated honor killing and at most h his client was guilty of manslaughter because he intended to drive close enough to his daughter noor to spit on her. she is not scared of him harming her. she thinks he is going to do something else, spit, embarrass, call her a name. deliberations begin. day one. no verdict. day two. they are still deliberating. day three. nothing. what were you thinking then? by that point i was afraid they were going to come back
that they were going to come back manslaughter. i was that concerned. bill: on the fourth day of deliberations, the jury reached a verdict. we the jury duly he impanelled and sworn in the aboven titled action on our oath do find the defendant as to count one, first-degree murder a domestic violence offense as to victim noor falaeh al-maleki not guilty we the jury do find the defendant as to count one, second-degree murder guilty. in other words, the jury did not agree that this was a premeditated murder. it was not an honor killing. a defeat for the prosecution. for the injuries suffered by family friend amal, the jury found al-maleki guilty of aggravated assault. he was also found guilty of two counts of leaving the scene of a serious accident. record believed she had failed