mentioned something we know that the afghanistan strategy was something that steve bannon was sort of pushing a change in. with steve bannon out, going back to breitbart, interesting comments from steve bannon and breitbart suggesting the presidency is over and they #war. the president commenting on the fact it might be helpful to have steve bannon on the outside. just with that as a backdrop, not asking to you comment on that, with that as a back group, approaching deadlines for the end of september, for the debt ceiling, government shutdown. is this impeding congress s ability in any way to get the work done that it needs to get done. media maelstrom over steve bannon is causing an awful lot. it s divisive. it s intended to be. the movement in my district they are constantly talking about it. you walk down the street in my district, 90% of the people don t know who steve bannon is. they elected the president by
strategic way to harm hillary clinton s campaign. the question is and seems to be is what was the motivation to harm the system and specifically to get donald trump elected. now, it seems like we are once again relitigating this case. of a clip that you just played a while ago, maybe it was the russians or the chinese or somebody in his home. actually a lot more specific than that. you can look at the hack itself and you can see the digital fingerprints that are left behind and you can identify the likely source of the attack and that when cyber security group did this several months ago, they came up with a conclusion that it was a russian back group. now, the water seems to be getting muddy yet again. richard engel is live for us.