york. not one witness against us other than one person who is a deranged, he s got a lot of problems, a man who has been convicted of lying, he s a felon, convicted felon, and not a good person, but that s their only witness and he s now crashed and burned. they have no witnesses, and by the way, that witness took back everything that he said. he took back everything he said in court, took it all back. so they have no case, it s a shame that a thing like this is able to happen, businesses leave new york, she went after exxon and they decided to move to texas and hundreds of millions of dollars they pay in taxes. i paid over $300 million of taxes over the last number of years, 300 million and they don t recognize that. they don t recognize anything. so not think of it, not one witness, millions of pages of documents, years of this nonsense and now it goes on and
not lying. with a man who has been convicted of not lying. a with a man who has been convicted of not lying, a convicted felon and not a good not lying, a convicted felon and not a good person. but that s her only witness a good person. but that s her only witness. he s now crashed and burned witness. he s now crashed and burned. that witness took back everything that he said. he took irack everything that he said. he took back everything in court, took it all back back everything in court, took it all back. they have no case, it s a shame that all back. they have no case, it s a shame that a all back. they have no case, it s a shame that a thing like this is able to happen shame that a thing like this is able to happen. businesses leave new york to happen. businesses leave new york she to happen. businesses leave new york. she went after exxon and they decided york. she went after exxon and they decided to york. she went after exxon and they decided to move t
trump and nauta will try to cripple and undermine the gunman s case. so, if they can do that, then a can give wall nauta more hope that he can actually survive that if the trial ever got that far. but if it fails which is where i assume this will go in the end, even with judge cannon presiding, then he ll do what allen weisselberg did in the end, which was pleaded guilty, agree to testify against donald trump, and do it in hopes of some type of lesser sentence as part of the plea deal, hoping that whatever it is is something he can live with and still have a life, because he s still a young guy in the end. christie greenberg, feel free to comment on the flip question, but i also want to get your view of this breaking news of the night that one of donald trump s lawyers, early on, wanted to go to the justice department after the search warrant and say, okay, we understand the situation, we promised you were handing back everything now, everything. was it a case that could be
wanted to go to the justice department after the search warrant and say, okay, we understand the situation, we promised you were handing back everything now, everything. was it a case that could be settled without charges at that point, after the search warrant? so, it s really hard to say. but certainly at that point, they did not have the ruling, the justice department did not have the ruling that the attorney client privilege had been pierced, and that the crime fraud exception applied. therefore, they didn t have any of evan corcoran s notes and its audio recordings, which are damning evidence of obstruction. so, back in late 2022, they just they have the result of the search warrant. their case got a lot stronger after that. so certainly, you would imagine that the doj would have at least entertain a meeting to listen to what they have to say,
year over a year trying, it is cooperative way that you are talking about, to get every government document that you might have at home back from you in a free zone, no harm no foul, if you give it back. and there comes a day when you give it back what you are telling us is all in your documents, and then the government discovers, they didn t give us back everything and so, the next time the government asks you for something, they do it with a subpoena. and where they do it with that subpoena, the second time, after you spent more than a year not giving them everything when you finally gave them something, how much of an extension of time would you expect from the government on that subpoena that is chasing what you are supposed to give them the first time you gave them documents and you didn t? unfortunately, your hypothetical departs widely from the actual facts.