at thehe present time, w wew ththere s 27 p people missssing abouout 4:4:15 yesteterday afte. still n no o break k in that chchowchilla, californrnia schc bus kidnappiping. 2 26 school c children anand bus driviver have vavanished. vanisished yesterdaday after nenear chowcwchilla, califororn. prpresident foford directeted t atattorney geneneral to ususe a availalable governrnment resour. > the californinia nationalad jojoins state,e, local pololice the fbfbi i in a giant s search the e children a and thehe drir. > it was like somebody come down f from m mars andnd just t them u up off the plplanet. > was i it anan o outright kidnappingng? a psycychopath o or a sesex man the e loose? > whoever d did it put t a g deal of plananning and effort a you u might evenen say mononey. may nevever have been as anguisishing a mysteryry. it t s the worsrst kind o of you can tell. being buried alive is our worst fear. > the c chowchilla kikids sh the world what c childhood tr
for r adults witith insomni. not gegetting enouough slep was leavaving me tirired. ohoh come on!! waitit, wait! and slowowing me down dururing my dayays. on youour left! mamaking even n the things i lolove difficucult. but t quviviq hehelped me get morore sleep. quviviviq works s differentltly than m medicationn you u may have t taken in t the past. it s thought t to target one of the biologogical causeses of insomomnia: overaractive wake signanals. and whenen taken evevery nig, studies s showed thahat sleeeep continueued toto improve o over time.. so nowow that i i m getting momore sleep,, things a are going back d downhill. in a a good way.y. do n notot take quviviviqf you have narcolepspsy. don n t drink k alcohol while e taking quvuviviq or driveve or operatate heavavy machinerery untitil you feelel fulllly alert. quviviq mamay cause tetempory inabilility to movove or t talk or halallucinatios whwhile fallining asasleep or wawaking up. ququviviq may y cause sleepineness during g th
legal experts can disagree about what s going to happen. but there is no doubt that this case is a case that would have been brought even if someone didn t have the name of donald trump, and that s just the reality of the fact that has been presented to date pointed out to mike davis. robert alvin bragg said that he had developed new evidence and that is part of why this case was brought back d brag, says that trump invited david pecker, the ami executive who was part of that catch and kill scheme to the wall. white house, trump brought him there to thank him for his help during the campaign that he pushes attorney to wait until after the election. regarding the payment of stormy daniels because then it wouldn t matter. so he s trying to make the case here that falsifying these records are directly tied to election interference in trying to promote his his candidacy. what do you say to that? well, first , i think it was a poor exercise of discretion, which is sort of my bottom line. ha