i mean, those are strong words.g the new york post reports that house oversight chairman james colmer, who is preparing to interview loved before he disappeared, say s he remains a potential witness in and , despites a probe the fact that he is a fugitive at this moment. left explosive allegations. well, they need to beressed. addressed and. his motive couldn t be clearer. this does not anything to do p with partisan politics. i m not a republican. repub i m not a democrat. i have no political motive or . enda i did it out of deep concernn tt that if the bidens were to comen to power, the country would be facing the same dramatic russia collusion scandal. only this time with china. sadly, because of the doj s cover, this is exactly what happened. we ve reached out to the doj, by the way, for a and weher have yet to hear back.a
unexpected, and hit than in the blue. unexpected, and hit than in the blue. we unexpected, and hit than in the blue, we will have to see if the attention blue, we will have to see if the attention turns to rishi sunak and potentially knew about dominic raab s potentially knew about dominic raab s behaviour because that was the next raab s behaviour because that was the next series of questions he would the next series of questions he would be the next series of questions he would be facing in the event his debuty would be facing in the event his deputy prime minister who is appointed only a few months ago had to resign appointed only a few months ago had to resign for allegations dating back to resign for allegations dating back a to resign for allegations dating back a few years. fire to resign for allegations dating back a few years. are indications the ublic back a few years. are indications the public will back a few years. are indications the public will see
three years ago signed off on stuff that is not gotten to taiwan. so china knows that part of the deterrence is not in place. listen, the defense department is put together some kind of tired team to go after this. we are going to have to move from dealing with ukraine has pulled back a scabbed for us. trying to keep up with ammunition that flowed into ukraine which is very different than the ammunition we would need and the weapons systems to deal with china. but the fact is our industrial base is not adequate now to go to war. it is struggling to support ukraine. against china as we ve seen in the exercises we played. we ve go out of ammunition in a week or two. we have to move to a war footing even though we are in peacetime. war footing in terms of the defense industrial base traded listen, here s the l thing in the room. we have a defense but the administration is touting is a
three years ago signed off on stuff that is not gotten to taiwan. so china knows that part of the deterrence is not in place. listen, the defense department is put together some kind of tired team to go after this. we are going to have to move from dealing with ukraine has pulled back a scabbed for us. trying to keep up with ammunition that flowed into ukraine which is very different than the ammunition we would need and the weapons systems to deal with china. but the fact is our industrial base is not adequate now to go to war. it is struggling to support ukraine. against china as we ve seen in the exercises we played. we ve go out of ammunition in a week or two. we have to move to a war footing even though we are in peacetime. war footing in terms of the defense industrial base traded listen, here s the l thing in the room. we have a defense but the administration is touting is a
miles to the next really good defensible terrain location. and if they get there, if they fall back, they re going to have to hold there. falling back a withdraw under pressure is one of the most difficult military operations. you suffer the risk of a catastrophic collapse and big losses when you do this. so it does make some sense and i can understand the logic of the ukrainians to hold where they are as long as they can. there are inflicting heavy casualties on the russians. we don t see bianna is we don t see what s behind the initial russian assault. we don t see the forces of raid back there. we also don t know how the ukrainian command is building up its own forces for the counter offensive and how much it can dwindle away that force if necessary to reinforce in bakhmut. so there is a lot of intangibles