Street. The building was demolished on july 24, 2018 before the structural problems were reported. The foundation poured is the subject of variance requested today. This is not an extraordinary and exceptional circumstance. We ask the commission not approve this variance and uphold the previous rulings by mandating building in the predemolition size and restoring breezeway and not rewarding violators with a vertical addition. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello, commissioners. I am carlos. I own 4124 21st street next to the project. The Planning Department received the false letter. Please remove that from your records. I have never supported th the project. The space around my home because of the new construction. They said they were going to stay within the envelope of the new house. The new wall is up against my house. Before i could walk between the houses. The new construction touches my roof and the space is flush with my house. Please dont let that happen. Thank you. Next spe
Use authorization for demolition of existing Single Family home and construction of a new two family home in rh2. Demolition of two story Single Family home and construction of new 5355 gross square foot four story two family home. Unit one on the bottom with two bedrooms and total of 1925 square feet. Unit two four bedrooms and three full baths 2158 square feet. One vehicle and one bicycle space for each vehicle. There was an application meeting on mar2019. Three maybes voiced concerns of the height of the building. The department received 25 letters of support describing the dwelling unit to the neighborhood. Consistency of the project design with existing neighborhood character and the garage spaces will not impact street parking. The department received four letters of opposition to the project from neighbors voicing concerns over the fourth floor on light and privacy to add jay sent buildings and out of context to the the neighborhood and concerns of the conversion of three unit s
Recovery after the fires. What is clear then as now is those survivors need help. A whole town was of people leftt homes overnight, and nine months later their lives are still in limbo. I know you know this, mr. Secretary, and i want to your attendance, your presence on mauit also your ability to listen to the needs of the survivors. I will make it very simple. The survivorsother communities g with disasters of their own. Baltimore is recovering from the tragic collapse of the Francis Scott key bridge, and as i maryland congressional delegation this rebuild. Are going to ge this past weekend, a fig derailt evacuations and highway closure. Till waiting to find out more about whatd the accident but are thankful nobody was hurt. It is an reminder of how important the investments we make in Transportation Safety are. In response to the derailment, this committee worked on a bipartisan to improve rail safety by researching in by ininmore needs to be done to hod the industry accountable and
As for continuance. Item one, case number 2021 hyphen 012028 inv for the stonestown development project, final Environmental Impact report is proposed for continuance to may 9th, 2020. For items two a through g for case numbers 2021 hyphen 012028e and v gpa, pc. A map. Sachdeva and wp hyphen zero two for the stonestown development project. Consideration of adoption of findings. General plan amendment planning code text and map amendments. Shadow findings. Development agreement guidelines document are proposed to be continued to may 9th, 2020. For item three, case number 2023. Hyphen 009969 see you at 249 texas street. Conditional use authorization is proposed for an indefinite continuance item for case number 2024. Hyphen 001501 pca for the state mandated accessory dwelling unit controls planning code amendments has been withdrawn, as has item five for case number 2020. Hyphen 0078068 1314 paige street. Conditional use authorization has also been withdrawn. Further commissioners. Under
Development unit. The question raised to have an expert on staff who is able to look demolitions more from an architect side, structural engineer, is there any way to augment that position by 1. 5 positions to do both . I think that the short answer, we think we have enough to financially support one person to just to be devoted to adu, but when those issues come up, other planners get involved. So Historic Preservation planner would look at if there is a preservation issue. At this point, the mayors budget request to all departments was not to add any positions so were pushing the envelope a little bit, because we think we can justify it based on the fees, but when the issues come up. I will take a little bit of exception to what ms. Hester said we just rubber stamp them, we spend a lot of time looking at them. The number of adu approved, we spent a lot of time looking at these issues when they do come in and Preservation Planners do look at them. My point is, there will be more than