sandra: really interesting, andy. you stopped for a moment and you see the exchanges that we have seen so far and the way the day has gone so far for this nominee and you are reminded what, you know, bret kavanaugh went through, amy coney barrett, and the stark difference in the way that the nominee is being questioned by in this case republicans of the nominee. yeah, you do, and i think this is to their credit and i hope, i think when they hope is voters will notice the difference. john: there s no question there is a huge difference in tone and tenor, she has not been asked even whether she drinks b beer, let alone what beer she drinks. when she was confirmed to the d.c. court of appeals she got three votes from the republicans, 53-44, graham,
like. you re saying you absolutely remember him using those phrases, meaning sexual terms? yeah, you know, it s very difficult in these sorts of situations, but the truth for me, and i think for others, is that there are things in your past that you remember photographically and things adjacent to it you can t remember at all. we talkedearlier. i have a clear picture in my mind with a person with a keg of b beer in their hand slowly pouring it on my pillow, into my mattress. i can t tell you who the other person was with me setting up and returning the furniture to the room. but it s sorry. if judge kavanaugh in his testimony is implying you have animus toward him because he was closer to another one of your roommates who you had fistfights, fights with, a contentious relationship with, and that has caused you animus and animus toward judge kavanaugh, you say what?