this document is bereft of it and a good objective, fair,id conscientious judge would have m said this is wrong. i m not going to allow it. professor, at this. a lot interesting, because americans are learning a lot about the law, finding out law,o about whatuthave what is needede and then bec in that indictment. and then because l we cann be a be honest here, you can be ayoua democrat and you can be a good judge. you can be a democrat, you cann be a lawyer. you cawhn be a gooateverd presir whatever . but so what we re seeing here, reough, is really we havk e to look atga, regardless of pary affiliation, if intions they rtheir actions they re doid the right thing. and this, of course, would seeme to indicate that he wasn t. professor, do you think thata this is going to be a part of what the defense will argue, why this should be thrown out? and do you think its point? will even get to trial at this point? welou re well, you re right n be a democrat and still demand that donald