we did consider that her husband made known that she was having an affair. where was? she there were no. answers nearly 30 years, 60 investigators, and it all kept coming back to one elusive suspect. he just very commonly said, i know how to get rid of a body, so it would never ever be found. him? murder something that could be done over it was basically an hour never situation. hello, welcome to dateline. when kathy had cole disappeared, police didn t know if they are dealing with a missing person case or cold-blooded murder. with little evidence to go on, the investigation grew cold. decades later, a young detective who was just a kid when kathy vanished, dusted off the old files. investigators couldn t solve her case then, could he help solve it now? here is josh mankiewicz, with she didn t come home. time can be like a river, a long stream of events rushing by. most barely make a ripple, but a few, like the sudden loss of a close friend, a child or a p
If you admit that she is never coming home, its like you admit defeat or that she is dead. A hardworking wife, a loving mother, a woman with a complicated love life. She was having affairs. They worked in the same office. Now, the secret was out. Replaced by a mystery. She never returned from lunch. We considered that they knew his wife was having an affair. Nearly 30 years, 60 investigators, and it kept coming back to one elusive suspect. We calmly said, i know how to get rid of the body. I think its something that can be done over a lunch hour. It was basically now or never. When kathy heckel disappeared, police hello dateline. When kathy disappeared, police did not know if they were dealing with a Missing Person case or coldblooded murder. With little evidence to go on, the investigation grew cold. Decades later, a young detective who was just a kid when kathy vanished dusted off the old files. Investigators could not solve her case then. Could he help solve it now . Time can be lik
shot down over the u.s. a lot more questions about this. and you know, michael, it brings another question. if, as the americans have said, this balloon had solar panels and had equipment on it the length of three buses, why would china be sending such equipment, such technology, flying around the world and not have a way to reclaim it? it would just seem to be throwing away resources, throwing away money. so many more questions that perhaps we ll get an answer from chinese government officials on monday when they do their routine briefings. yeah. appreciate the update, ivan watson in hong kong. military analyst malcolm davis is the senior analyst at the australian strategic policy institute. he joins me now from canberra. good to see you. what do you make of china s story of a civilian commercial