an apartment block in kyiv. attacked this morning. emergency services say one person was killed and 12 were injured. in the northern suburbs of the capital, authorities say an aircraft manufacturing plant was also shelled by russian forces. these attacks followed the sustained bombardment of other cities. such as mariupol. before and after satellite footage shows the devastating impact on residential areas. following an attack on a maternity hospital in the city, a woman was seen being carried away on a stretcher. this morning, there are reports that both she and her child have died from their injuries. a situation described by the red cross as a waking nightmare.
about the shooting itself. when he spoke about his dog x he started to get teary. another subject that came up was the chain of events that happened after the shooting. he talked about the fact that they didn t call police. they went back to the he toll. let s listen to what he said. we were there looking out the windows like awaking nightmare. every car was a red suv, i mean, to us. we thought we had just made them go away and that they were going to come back. you didn t call the police, did you? no, never did. you didn t call the police at the store, right? i i didn t call the police at all until the following morning. this is just got to be a huge problem for the defense, jeffrey. why didn t they call the police? why did they go back to the hotel. did he make up any ground there.
over, i believe, i m not in the courtroom, but he would answer and look over at the jury. is that something that the defense attorney would instruct the defendant to do? is that more effective? it was apparent to me there had been a certain amount of pre planning of the testimony in a bad way, it s coaching. in a good way it s making sure you come across well. expert witnesses know very well to turn to the jury when you try to relate to them. the fact he had catch phrases like waking nightmare was overused. if the jury believes he s coached or not being honest. it will work against him greatly. the only thing for this jury to consider is whether mr. dunn acted reasonably in his fear. if they don t believe him they ll not believe that. they already had a tough time trying to figure out why if they was acting reasonably with the gunshots. why the unreasonable behavior afterwards not calling a cop is