Seyfarth Synopsis: Federal judges are requiring attorneys to attest as to whether they have used generative artificial intelligence (AI) in court filings, and if so, how and in what.
A month ago, I wrote about Judge Kevin Castel (S.D.N.Y.)'s May 4 order in Mata v. Avianca, Inc.: The Court is presented with an unprecedented circumstance. A…
In what may be the beginning of a trend, Judge Brantley Starr of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently issued a new mandatory rule regarding the use of.
You may have recently seen press reports about lawyers who filed and submitted papers to the federal district court for the Southern District of New York that included citations to cases and decisions.
Judge Brantley Starr of the Northern District of Texas new order: Mandatory Certification Regarding Generative Artificial Intelligence and he will strike any party filing that does not include the required certificate, attorneys will be held responsible under Rule 11