taken that off the table. it s in florida, strongest legal argument that that is exactly where it should be brought. there s no venue challenge that s going to come up of bringing it in florida. and obviously, we know, obviously we haven t seen it, we know from jim and from cnn reporting, you ve got espionage, witness tamper, and conspiracy, among what s referenced in the summons that they got. but you know, interesting, as ty says, seven charges seems to be very specific, very buttoned up, very tight. though, when i hear, witness tampering, espionage, conspiracy, all in there, with presumably obstruction, that s a lot in a few counts. it s a lot in the few counts. i want to be careful and clear here. when we sees s espionage act, not the cloak and dagger trench coats and sort of spying, but it s the mishandling and retention of information that could harm the defense interests of the united states. that s probably what was charged
themselves from that. because obviously, that s where the bulk of the activity, in terms of the unlawful possession and obstruction occurred. does it speed it up, and so it sounds like you re getting rid of some of the delays that will come through venue challenge and others. does it speed up enough that this could somehow get through the process before the election, by doing it in south florida? so that s an excellent question. i know that s on everybody s mind. i think we, as we ve talked over the course the last year. this is, this is right up against the line at which it is conceivable that it could get to trial before election. i think, had they waited till september later, that would have been very difficult. but i think by, a bringing it in florida, be limiting it to seven counts, which i think is very prosecutorial, very professional, and very intelligent approach. unlike, bringing 34 charges or
could get through the system prior to the election. i think that s right, and before this point, if you were to ask me what is trump s strongest legal argument, i would have said venue. if they brought in d. c. , that would be the place that he could make an argument and a challenge that they brought in the wrong jurisdiction. which could also ultimately end up in the entire case being thrown. so the risk is it being thrown out, and even if you win, you just burned a lot of time. exactly. exactly. so, now they ve taken it off the table. because in florida, the strongest legal argument that is exactly where it should be brought. there is no venue challenge that s gonna come up in bringing him in florida. and obviously, we know, we obviously haven t seen it, we know from jim trusty and from cnn reporting, you ve got espionage to witness tampering and conspiracy, among what s reference in the summons that they got. but, interesting as ty says, the charges seem to be very specifi
Associated in the past with high-quality materials and devoted service, today, luxury means intelligence. Luxury clients want a smooth and frictionless experience from the very first moment they enter the building, and of course, it starts with the .