convictions is beyond me. but again, my guess is they filed the notice of appeal, took this as an automatic m s to protect her right and protect their bar card. jamie: that makes sense. you have to do that in order to bring it later if you decide. but it doesn t escape me, david, think about it. she was convicted. she had to do jail time. she got credit for time served. and for good behavior. but she could literally wipe her record clean if there was some reversible error, jury misconduct or a ruling that the judge made. there were a couple of times where experts, legal experts like yourself said that could be appealed. so what are the chances? yeah. the chances of these convictions being reversed is nil. there is no question she lied to lied to cops. the record is clear as day. i don t think they challenged that. the big problem is the civil suit. the wages or the earnings
which would have been the worse. they are appealing the conviction on lying top cops. we know she didn t report her daughter missing. we know that the city and the state had to pay money to search for a baby they say they knew was dead from an accident. what is up from that? finally notice of appeal in case like this is automatic, so they filed the notice, but it doesn t necessarily mean that they will file an appeal. they just got to protect casey s right. it s rather extraordinary when you think about it, what she got away with. apparently. and the fact that they want to not let sleeping dog s lie and kick this thing back up. bring it back in the system of criminal justice on an appeal level. why they are doing it when she basically skated with credit for time served and four minor relatively minor convictions is beyond me. but again, my guess is they filed the notice of appeal, took this as an automatic m s to protect her right and