a department store around 1996. he is likely to appeal, but this is certainly a victory for e. jean carroll. and jean casarez, president trump s lawyer trying to make a big deal out of the fact that the jury did the not find him liable for rape, but this is a big verdict for e. jean carroll. $5 million, donald trump found liable for defamation and battery. it is very interesting. it s definitely a victory for the plaintiffs. no question about it for e. jean carroll. she got justice today this was a trial where she testified for hours and she testified with great detail of how he raped her. she went through every single bit of how she did it and then went immediately to her friends. she told them exactly what happened. both of those friends who testified told her in 197, he raped you. and the jury did not believe more like ly than not because that s your standard legally, that he did rape her. they went to the second loo n line, which would be sexual abuse. it would be fas
you said marla is in this photo? that s my wife. which one are you pointing to? here. that was e. jean carroll. the woman on the right is your then wife. it s very blurry. 12k3w4rr the former president did not take the stand i but that deposition was not helpful for his case autoal and gave a boost to e. jean carroll. we haven t heard from the jurors to explain how it factored in. it s unclear if we will. even at the end of today, the judge advised them to remain anonymous for a long time. paula reid, thank you. let s bring in natasha. she accused trump of assaulting
tempt of the trump administration behind bars. you were talking specifically about absentee ballot mills, as you call them. people should go to jail. let me be clear. that s still my position. the people involved in this that executed it and knew about illegal hafr, they should be spending their time in prison through the second term of the pence administration. that s not changed autoal. that s why i m here to talk about how bad this is. i m just trying to say one thing is we do not necessarily examine the vote totals very closely of our winning candidates. we win and we move on to the general election. i did notice that it came out favorable for mr. harris, but we didn t look at the absentee ballot. we asked around a little bit and what we were told is something that i think is true, but incomplete is that mr. harris had a number of churches that
seeing that shape, seeing that change over time gives you some sense of the way we ve evolved in terms of both law enforcement and counterterrorism. both at the international level autoal but responding and being resilient once it happens. peter krauss. thanks for being here. thanks for having me. based on what we though thus far, what are you most curious about, watching for most in temples of figuring out whether this might be ascribeable to terrorist groups we know of? the number of bombings going off in close proximity, time-wise, signature from possible planning from lone wolf individuals or perhaps an organization. so you want to look for that. you want to look for claiming. as far as i know no group claimed the attack yet. sometimes we see that early on. we haven t seen that here. you want to look to some degree, whether you have video there. on one hand this was a good attack for these people in a sense this is a public event, it s a soft target.