And once again, we are live here on cspan2 for the 16th Public Meeting of the defense Advisors Committee on prosecution and defense of Sexual Assault in the armed forces. This meeting is open. Before we get started, apparently in order to speak, you need to hit request. The green, and when youre done that seems odd, in any event, mr. Sullivan, thank you, and good morning. I want to welcome the members and everybody in attendance today on valentines day to the 16th Public Meeting of the Defense Advisory Committee on the investigation, prosecution and defense of Sexual Assault in the armed forces. Or da krchc. Miss cannon. Here. Miss garvin. Here. Mr. Cramer. Here. Ms. Long. Here. Mr. Markey. Here. Dr. Markowicz. Here. General swank. Present. Doctor spahn. Here. Judge grimm by telephone . Telephonically here. Miss tocash by telephone . Im here. Great. Judge, chief and mckinley and judge walton couldnt be in attendance, but with 11 in presence we have a quorum. It was for fiscal year 2015
About 40 million. After 2023, it was uncertain how that liability would be paid down and our discussions at that time with the Housing Authority, there was an assumption there would be sufficient residual receipts to pay down that liability but it is an ongoing risk for the Housing Authority. So in terms of our report, we made 16 recommendations and some of these pertain to the mou thats before you today. Although none of them would in any way impact your approval of the mou in this meeting. So of the 16 recommendations, we heard from the mayors housing who will be responding to the audit and agreed with the 12 of the recommendations or qualifications and disagreed with four and well go through the four disagreements. It would be transparent about what the status of funding was and then for early reporting to the board possible vouchers shortfalls in the Housing Voucher Program and one of the things thats important here is that because theres assumption that the funding for the formula
That liability would be paid down and our discussions at that time with the Housing Authority, there was an assumption there would be sufficient residual receipts to pay down that liability but it is an ongoing risk for the Housing Authority. So in terms of our report, we made 16 recommendations and some of these pertain to the mou thats before you today. Although none of them would in any way impact your approval of the mou in this meeting. So of the 16 recommendations, we heard from the mayors housing who will be responding to the audit and agreed with the 12 of the recommendations or qualifications and disagreed with four and well go through the four disagreements. It would be transparent about what the status of funding was and then for early reporting to the board possible vouchers shortfalls in the Housing Voucher Program and one of the things thats important here is that because theres assumption that the funding for the formula can lead to shotfalls there is supplemental fundin
Time with the Housing Authority, there was an assumption there would be sufficient residual receipts to pay down that liability but it is an ongoing risk for the Housing Authority. So in terms of our report, we made 16 recommendations and some of these pertain to the mou thats before you today. Although none of them would in any way impact your approval of the mou in this meeting. So of the 16 recommendations, we heard from the mayors housing who will be responding to the audit and agreed with the 12 of the recommendations or qualifications and disagreed with four and well go through the four disagreements. It would be transparent about what the status of funding was and then for early reporting to the board possible vouchers shortfalls in the Housing Voucher Program and one of the things thats important here is that because theres assumption that the funding for the formula can lead to shotfalls there is supplemental funding from hud but the Housing Authority has to apply in sufficien
Items acted upon today will appear on the december 10t december 10th board of supervisors board of agenda. Item agenda number one is an ordinance amending the health code to maintain and operate at full capacity an adult residential facility with no fewer than 41 beds and amending the administrative code to establish the working group to advise the board of supervisors and the mayor regarding resident care, training, workplace conditions and staffing at the arf at 887 patrro. Thank you. This item is before us following substantive amendments at last weeks meeting and i want to note that the legislative aid for supervisor ronan is here should we have any questions on this item. Before we go to Public Comment, supervisor brown, do you have any comments . No. Any members who would like to testify on this item . Seeing none, point comment is closed. And can we send this item to the full bider positive recommendation without objection . Yes. And so mr. Clerk, please calls items 2, 3, 4, 5 a