From a hole in the ground. Yet here i stand. This was closer than many people anticipated it would be. Votesow, not 50 of the are in, but we are not going to win the race and that is ok to read we have conceded the fact will have mcconnell the votes to win. Thats the conversation we wanted to have. This is not what drew us to this race. I want to start, first of all, by analogy my family. Whooduce, for those of you have never met them in person. This is my beautiful wife. [applause] i shouldnt have turned around like that. That was a big mistake. I was doing great, actually. Until i turned around and looked at her. I am so blessed by an extraordinary wife. An extraordinary mother. Somebody who has poured herself into this in ways that have truly been above and beyond. I am blessed by nine beautiful children. Awesome children. Attentive, well behaved. Able to act as if i am still interesting when they have heard the same thing 400 times. They are extraordinary. [applause] this is jonah
The amendment offered by the gentlewoman from california. Those in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, the noes have it. The amendment is not agreed to. Ms. Sanchez mr. Chairman. I request the yeas and nays. The chair the gentlewoman ask has asked for a recorded vote. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule 18, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from california will be postponed. It is now in order to consider amendment number 4 printed in house report 113455. For what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition . Mr. Lamborn mr. Chairman, i have an amendment at the desk. The chair the clerk will designate the amendment. The clerk amendment number 4 printed in house report 113455 offered by mr. Lamborn of colorado. The chair pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman from colorado, mr. Lamborn, and a member opposed each will control five minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from colorado. Mr. Lamborn thank you, mr.
Classified the Internet Access service and Information Services are limited to the really broadband Internet Access service. And there are things that broadband providers do that are not broadband Internet Access service that could be clarified to be the common Carrier Service that could get you some amount on the road in helping to create a more even Playing Field with regard to content that is transmitted by the providers so that is a possibility. And they could move relatively quickly on that. If it works under 706 and it constitutes Something Like the internet policy statement, it likely would have to be adopted as a rule with some clarification that allows them to affirmatively engage and differentiated services. So that they are not common Care Services or have a rule consistent with 706 high level rule, no walking and how that at adjudicated on the case by case basis. And chairman, we noticed on the case by case basis it would be appropriate, and that would not necessarily invol
Pasture, and get things done. [applause] the next question comes from nick, managing editor of the hays daily news. It will be addressed to mr. Orman first. The winner of this election will likely play a significant role in the development of the next farm bill. Tot do you see as necessary feed a growing and hungry world . First and foremost, the farmers i have talked to around this date the state say it is the Crop Insurance policy be they need to be able to plant their crops with certainty. We have significantly more uncertain weather patterns. I think that is vital to the inelopment of the economy kansas and the farmers in kansas. The other issue we face is water. Thetor roberts referred to 50year water plan. We also have to look at the farm bill and make sure we are not inadvertently encouraging or discouraging the planting of lowwaterintensity crops. In kansaso farmers who said they would like to plant more, but the cost of insuring it is significantly more expensive than planting
Best call and to say this ase Information Service or this is a Telecommunications Service and then say okay under the congress rules here is what applies to it. And there is something to me that says well, we didnt get to you the thing that we want by giving our best shot and applying the statute in the first time. So in order to get into the Regulatory Authority that we want to be in, we are going to change our mind. It seems to be the exact kind of outcome oriented Decision Making that the components of the Net Neutrality would get aggravated about and very angry about as if it were pursued in the pursuit of some of their ends. So im very reluctant to promote or to account the regime in which the fcc to fit into the scheme. Lets see the fcc were to do this and i have to agree with mark that we like it to need it least one last comment. The issues in the order lets say the best case is the last third or fourth quarter. I dont think that this would be a good case. That would lead to a